CULP INC New Standards Disclosure
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Effective December 14, 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2023-09 Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures ("ASU 2023-09"), which is an update to Topic 740, Income Taxes. The amendments in this update relate to improvements regarding the transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation by jurisdiction of information included in the effective income tax rate reconciliation and for income taxes paid. Also, the amendments allow investors to better assess an entity's: (i) capital allocation decisions, (ii) worldwide operations, and (iii) related tax risks, tax planning, and operational opportunities that affect the effective income tax rate and prospects for future cash flows. The other amendments in this update improve the effectiveness and comparability of disclosures relating to pretax income (or loss) and income tax expense (or benefit) and remove disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial or relevant. became effective during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, and we applied this new guidance retrospectively in our fiscal 2026 annual consolidated financial statements. This guidance did not have an impact on our results of operations and financial condition, but did have a material impact on the disclosures required in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, which are disclosed in Note 12.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03 Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (“ASU 2024-03”), which is an update to Topic 220, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income. ASU 2024-03 enhances transparency and decision-usefulness of expense disclosures in response to investors' requests for more detailed, disaggregated expense information, enabling a clearer understanding of a public business entity's performance and cost structure. The amendments improve disclosure requirements in the notes to the financial statement for specific expense categories including: (i) inventory purchases, (ii) employee compensation, (iii) depreciation, and (iv) intangible asset amortization, as well as (v) the total amount of selling expenses, and in annual reporting periods, the entity's definition of selling expense. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, (i.e., our fiscal 2028 annual report) and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 (i.e., first quarter of fiscal 2029 interim report). Early adoption is permitted. The company is currently evaluating ASU 2024-03 to determine the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Currently, there are no new accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Want the next CULP INC new standards disclosure the moment it drops?
Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment CULP INC's next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Jul 17, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2025 | Jul 11, 2025 | |
| 2024 | Jul 12, 2024 | |
| 2023 | Jul 14, 2023 | |
| 2022 | Jul 15, 2022 | |
| 2021 | Jul 16, 2021 | |
| 2020 | Jul 17, 2020 | |
| 2019 | Jul 12, 2019 | |
| 2018 | Jul 13, 2018 | |
| 2017 | Jul 14, 2017 | |
| 2016 | Jul 15, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.