Cryoport, Inc. Fair Value Disclosure
Note 7. Fair Value Measurements
We measure fair value based on the prices that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements are based on a three-tier hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. These tiers include the following:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets but corroborated by market data. These inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted market prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as consider counterparty credit risk in the assessment of fair value.
We did not elect the fair value option, as allowed, to account for financial assets and liabilities that were not previously carried at fair value. Therefore, material financial assets and liabilities that are not carried at fair value, such as trade accounts receivable and payable, are reported at their historical carrying values.
The carrying values of our assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 approximate fair value because of our ability to immediately convert these instruments into cash with minimal expected change in value which are classified in the table below in one of the three categories of the fair value hierarchy described above (in thousands):
| Fair Value Measurements | |||||||||||
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |||||
December 31, 2025 |
| |||||||||||
Assets: |
| |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Money market mutual fund | $ | 208,124 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 208,124 | ||||
Mutual funds |
| 99,182 |
| — |
| — |
| 99,182 | ||||
U.S. Treasury notes |
| 19,838 |
| — |
| — |
| 19,838 | ||||
Corporate debt securities |
| 41,694 |
| — |
| — |
| 41,694 | ||||
$ | 368,838 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 368,838 | |||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Convertible Senior Notes | $ | — | $ | 185,094 | $ | — | $ | 185,094 | ||||
Contingent consideration |
| — |
| — | 629 |
| 629 | |||||
$ | — | $ | 185,094 | $ | 629 | $ | 185,723 | |||||
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |||||
December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
| |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Money market mutual fund | $ | 134 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 134 | ||||
Mutual funds |
| 97,675 |
| — |
| — |
| 97,675 | ||||
U.S. Treasury notes |
| 41,948 |
| — |
| — |
| 41,948 | ||||
Corporate debt securities |
| 76,837 |
| — |
| — |
| 76,837 | ||||
$ | 216,594 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 216,594 | |||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Convertible Senior Notes | $ | — | $ | 198,217 | $ | — | $ | 198,217 | ||||
Contingent consideration |
| — |
| — | 6,559 |
| 6,559 | |||||
$ | — | $ | 198,217 | $ | 6,559 | $ | 204,776 | |||||
Our equity securities and available-for-sale debt securities, including U.S. treasury notes and corporate debt securities are valued using inputs observable in active markets for identical securities and are therefore classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.
We did not have any financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
We carry the Convertible Senior Notes at face value less the unamortized discount and issuance costs on our consolidated balance sheets and present fair value for disclosure purposes only, see Note 12 – Convertible Senior Notes for additional information. We estimate the fair value of the Convertible Senior Notes using the net present value of the payments, discounted at an interest rate that is consistent with market and risk-adjusted interest rates, which is a Level 2 input.
The following table presents the estimated fair values and the carrying values (in thousands):
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||
| Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | |||||
2026 Convertible Senior Notes | $ | 185,094 | $ | 176,579 | $ | 183,919 | $ | 164,525 | ||||
2025 Convertible Senior Notes | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14,298 | $ | 14,125 | ||||
Under the terms of the F-airGate, Cell&Co, Polar Expres, and Bluebird Express acquisitions, contingent consideration may be payable in cash based on the achievement of certain future revenue and/or EBITDA targets during each annual period following the acquisition dates for a total of four years, up to a maximum of $26.1 million (undiscounted) in the aggregate. The fair value of the contingent consideration was measured at the end of each reporting period using Level 3 inputs. The fair value of the contingent consideration for the F-airGate and Polar Expres acquisitions was determined using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model.
The fair value of the contingent consideration for the Cell&Co and Bluebird Express acquisitions was valued based on unobservable inputs using a Monte Carlo simulation. These inputs included the estimated amount and timing of projected future revenue, a discount rate, a risk-free rate, asset volatility and revenue volatility. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. The contingent consideration was determined to have an aggregate fair value of $0.6 million and $6.6 million which is reflected as contingent consideration liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Certain assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the contingent consideration are uncertain by nature. Actual results may differ materially from estimates.
The gains recognized in earnings and the change in net assets related to the contingent consideration at December 31, 2025 were as follows (in thousands):
| Fair Value | | Gains | | Reclassification | | Foreign | | Fair Value | ||||||
December 31, | recognized in | to current | currency | December 31, | |||||||||||
2024 | earnings | payables | adjustment | 2025 | |||||||||||
$ | 909 | $ | (92) | $ | (881) | $ | 64 | $ | — | ||||||
| 742 |
| (207) |
| — |
| 94 |
| 629 | ||||||
4,908 | (4,908) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
$ | 6,559 | $ | (5,207) | $ | (881) | $ | 158 | $ | 629 | ||||||
The net gains recognized in earnings have been reported in operating costs and expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 5, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 7, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 13, 2024 | |
About Fair Value Disclosures
Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.
Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.