DANA Inc New Standards Disclosure
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
On December 31, 2025, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. This guidance requires disaggregated income tax disclosures on the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. See Note 17 for more information.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In December 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2025-10, Government Grants (Topic 832), which addresses the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of government grants, including grants related to income and grants related to assets. The new guidance leverages the principles in the accounting framework for government assistance in IFRS, specifically IAS 20, with certain targeted improvements. This ASU requires entities to recognize government grants only when it is probable that the entity will meet the stipulated grant conditions and ultimately receive the grant funds. This ASU provides two acceptable methods for accounting for grants related to assets: the grant may be initially recognized as deferred income, or it may be recorded as an adjustment to reduce the cost basis of the related asset. For grants related to income, the standard mandates that these shall be consistently recognized as deferred income. Deferred grants should be recognized in earnings on a systematic and rational basis either under a general heading such as other income or deducted from the related expense. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2028, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods; early adoption is permitted. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), which provides targeted amendments to better align U.S. GAAP with common risk management practices. The guidance simplifies cash flow hedge accounting for forecasted transactions primarily by allowing entities to hedge a broader group of risks using a single derivative. Additionally, the ASU expands the scope of qualifying hedged items to include certain nonfinancial components, creates an optional accounting model for "choose-your-rate" debt instruments, and eliminates the recognition mismatch for dual-hedge strategies. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026; early adoption is permitted. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which eliminates the sequential software development-stage model and requires capitalization when management authorizes and commits to funding a software project and determines it is probable of completion. In evaluating whether it is probable the project will be completed, management is required to consider whether there is significant uncertainty associated with the development activities of the software. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the guidance on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which introduces a practical expedient that allows entities to assume conditions existing at the balance-sheet date will remain constant over the remaining life of current accounts receivable and contract assets arising from revenue transactions. The guidance is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (Subtopic 220-40), which requires public entities to disclose detailed components of income statement expenses, such as inventory purchases, employee compensation, depreciation and amortization within relevant expense captions. Companies are also required to explain amounts not disaggregated and define and disclose total selling expenses. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. We are currently evaluating the impact of the guidance on our financial statement disclosures.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 27, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 20, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 20, 2024 | |
| 2021 | Feb 23, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Feb 18, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Feb 14, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Feb 15, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Feb 14, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Feb 10, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Feb 18, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.