Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) Number 2024-03, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures” (“ASU 2024-03”). ASU 2024-03 requires disclosure of certain costs and expenses on an interim and annual basis in the notes to the financial statements. Annual disclosure requirements under ASU 2024-03 will become effective for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2027, and interim disclosure requirements will become effective beginning in the first quarter of 2028. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption of ASU 2024-03 on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU Number 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures” (“ASU 2023-09”). ASU 2023-09 requires more disaggregated income tax disclosures, including additional information in the rate reconciliation and additional disclosures about income taxes paid. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company implemented the provisions of ASU 2023-09 applicable to annual reporting retrospectively. The adoption did not result in any material changes to the consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 8, Income Taxes for the required additional disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 24, 2026Showing above
2023Feb 29, 2024
2021Mar 16, 2022

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.