Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. New Standards Disclosure
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements:
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update on a prospective basis. This standard improves the transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the effective tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. It also includes certain other amendments to improve the effectiveness of income tax disclosures. The adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. For additional information, see Note 13 — Income Taxes.
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Want the next Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?
Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 30, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 31, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Apr 16, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Apr 17, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 29, 2022 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.