T3 Defense Inc. New Standards Disclosure
| Y. | New Accounting Pronouncements |
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
The Company adopted ASU 2023-08 on January 1, 2025 using a modified retrospective approach. The adoption affected the accounting for certain crypto assets within the scope of ASC 350-60, which are now measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Digital tokens that provide enforceable contractual rights to receive future goods or services from the issuer are excluded from the scope of ASC 350-60 and continue to be accounted for based on their economic substance. The impact of adoption was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The amendments in this ASU add specific requirements for income tax disclosures to improve transparency and decision usefulness. The guidance in ASU 2023-09 requires that public business entities disclose specific categories in the income tax rate reconciliation and provide additional qualitative information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. In addition, the amendments in ASU 2023-09 require that all entities disclose the amount of income taxes paid disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign taxes and disaggregated by individual jurisdictions. The ASU also includes other disclosure amendments related to the disaggregation of income tax expense between federal, state and foreign taxes. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025. Early adoption is permitted for annual financial statements that have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The amendments in this update should be applied on a prospective basis and retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this ASU to determine its impact on the Company’s disclosures.
In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Identifying the Acquirer in a Business Combination Involving a Variable Interest Entity. This ASU modifies the guidance for identifying the accounting acquirer in transactions involving VIEs. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. The amendments are applied prospectively to business combinations occurring after the adoption date. The Company consolidates certain entity that is considered VIEs and is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements; however, the impact will depend on the nature of future transactions.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. The amendments introduce a practical expedient for estimating expected credit losses on current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under ASC 606. ASU 2025-05 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the timing of adoption and the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-07, Derivatives Scope Refinements and Scope Clarification for Share-Based Noncash Consideration from a Customer in a Revenue Contract. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not currently have contracts that include share-based noncash consideration; however, management is evaluating the potential impact of this ASU on future transactions.
In September 2025, the FASB also issued ASU 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which modifies the recognition threshold for capitalization of internal-use software costs. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU on its internal-use software capitalization policy and does not expect a material impact upon adoption.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements, which clarifies the guidance in Topic 270 to improve the consistency of interim financial reporting. The ASU provides a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures and introduces a disclosure principle requiring entities to disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. ASU 2025-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this ASU to determine its impact on the Company’s disclosures.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Apr 9, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 10, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Jul 12, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 10, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 31, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Oct 13, 2021 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.