Note 16 – Fair Value Measurements

The following table provides the carrying value and fair value measurement information for certain financial assets and liabilities. The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable, accrued expenses, lease liabilities, notes payables and equipment and vehicle notes included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets approximated fair value at December 31, 2025 and 2024, as applicable, and generally represent Level 2 fair values due to their short-term nature. Therefore, such financial assets and liabilities are not presented in the following table:

 

Fair Value Measurements Using:

Carrying

 

Total Fair

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

Amount

  ​ ​ ​

Value

  ​ ​ ​

Inputs

  ​ ​ ​

Inputs

  ​ ​ ​

Inputs

December 31, 2025 liabilities

Debt - Credit Facility

$

14,146

$

14,146

$

$

14,146

$

Debt - Convertible Promissory Note - Related Party, excluding debt discount

1,138

1,506

1,506

Derivative Instrument - Embedded Derivative

281

281

281

December 31, 2024 liabilities

 

 

 

  ​

 

  ​

 

  ​

Debt - Credit Facility

$

11,089

$

11,089

$

$

11,089

$

Debt - Convertible Promissory Note - Related Party, excluding debt discount

Derivative Instrument - Embedded Derivative

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values in the table above and other fair value measurements.

Level 2

Debt – The fair value of our Credit Facility variable rate debt approximates the carrying value as the underlying prime rate changes based on prevailing market rates. See below for discussion on the fair value determination of the related party promissory note.

Level 3

Impairment of oil and natural gas properties – The fair value of proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties was measured using valuation techniques that convert the future cash flows to a single discounted amount. Significant inputs to the valuation of proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties include estimates of: (i) recoverable reserves; (ii) production rates; (iii) future operating and development costs; (iv) future commodity prices; and (v) a market-based weighted-average costs of capital. The Company utilized a combination of the New York Mercantile Exchange strip pricing and consensus pricing to value the reserves, then applied various discount rates depending on the classification of reserves and other risk characteristics. For significant acquisitions, management utilized the assistance of a third-party valuation expert to estimate the value of the oil and natural gas properties acquired.

Asset Retirement Obligation – The fair value of AROs is included in proved oil and natural gas properties with a corresponding liability. The fair value was determined based on a discounted cash flow model, which included assumptions of the estimated current abandonment costs, discount rate, inflation rate and timing associated with the incurrence of these costs.

Empire applies the provisions of fair value measurement on a non-recurring basis to its non-financial assets and liabilities, including oil and gas properties and asset retirement obligations. These assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments if events or changes in certain circumstances indicate that adjustments may be necessary. We determined certain proved and unproved oil and gas properties are not expected to recover their entire carrying value through future cash flows as well as a substantial change in certain circumstances and therefore recorded an impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2025. We did not identify any impairments for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Warrants – The fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the September Note further described in Note 7 was measured using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Key inputs for the Black-Scholes model include the stock price, exercise price, expected term, risk-free rate, volatility, and dividend yield. We consider this a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy as estimated volatility is generally unobservable and requires estimation.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis – In the determination of the fair value of the February Note and the September Note discussed further in Note 7 including the embedded conversion feature, Empire used a binomial lattice valuation model to value Level 3 derivative liabilities at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. This model incorporates transaction details such as Empire’s stock price, contractual terms of the respective notes, and unobservable inputs classified as Level 3 including risk-free rate and expected volatility. As of the conversion option exercise date of May 24, 2024, related to the February Note, these unobservable inputs were 5.0% and 46.9%, respectively. Due to the subjective nature of these inputs, the fair value measurement could differ materially under alternative assumptions.

Free Sentinel

Want the next EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORP fair value disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORP's next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 13, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 27, 2025

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.