Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
The Company assesses the adoption impacts of recently issued accounting pronouncements on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as well as material updates to previous assessments.

Accounting Guidance Implemented in 2025

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”), which expands disclosure requirements for income taxes, specifically related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company has adopted this guidance for the year ended December 31, 2025, refer to Note 8. “Income Taxes” for further information on the impact on the Company’s disclosures.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which expands disclosure requirements for more detailed information about the types of expenses in commonly presented expense captions. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of the ASU may have on its disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 20, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 20, 2025
2023Feb 29, 2024
2022Mar 7, 2023

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.