Standards Adopted in 2023

On January 1, 2023, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, “Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, as amended, which replaces the incurred loss methodology with an expected loss methodology, referred to as the “current expected credit loss” (“CECL” or the “CECL Standard”) methodology. The measurement of expected credit losses under the CECL methodology is applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loan receivables and securities held-to-maturity, as well as off-balance sheet credit exposures, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees. The CECL Standard significantly made changes to estimates of credit losses related to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loans receivable and certain other contracts. In addition, the CECL Standard made changes to the accounting for available-for-sale securities. One such change is to require credit losses to be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down on available-for-sale securities that management does not intend to sell or believes that it is more likely than not they will be required to sell.

The Company adopted the CECL Standard using the modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit exposures. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2023, are presented under the CECL Standard while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP with a cumulative effect adjustment as of the beginning of the reporting period.

The adoption of the CECL Standard resulted in an initial increase of $283 thousand to the allowance for credit losses and an increase of $500 thousand to the reserve for unfunded commitments in other liabilities. The after-tax cumulative effect of adopting the CECL Standard was a decrease to retained earnings of $568 thousand as of January 1, 2023.

The following table illustrates the allowance for credit losses impact of the CECL Standard:

January 1, 2023

As Reported

Impact of

Under

Pre-CECL

CECL

CECL

Adoption

Adoption

Assets:

Loans

Multifamily

$

2,025

$

2,017

$

8

Commercial real estate

913

1,022

(109)

1 – 4 family

61

192

(131)

Commercial

9,159

8,645

514

Consumer

348

347

1

Allowance for credit losses on loans

$

12,506

$

12,223

$

283

Liabilities:

Allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments

$

500

$

$

500

Standards Adopted in 2024

In 2024, the Company adopted ASU 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures”, which is intended to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. In addition, the amendments enhance interim disclosure requirements, clarify circumstances in which an entity can disclose multiple segment measures of profit or loss, provide new segment disclosure requirements for entities with a single reportable segment, and contain other disclosure requirements. The purpose of the amendments is to enable investors to better understand an entity’s overall performance and assess potential future cash flows. The adoption of this standard did not have material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Standards That Have Not Yet Been Adopted

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures”, intended to enhance the transparency of income tax disclosures, primarily related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. Specifically, the amendments in this ASU require disclosure of: (i) a tabular reconciliation, using both percentages and reporting currency amounts, with prescribed categories that are required to be disclosed, and the separate disclosure and disaggregation of prescribed reconciling items with an effect equal to 5% or more of the amount determined by multiplying pretax income from continuing operations by the applicable statutory rate; (ii) a qualitative description of the states and local jurisdictions that make up the majority (greater than 50%) of the effect of the state and local income taxes; and (iii) amount of income taxes paid, net of refunds received, disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign taxes and by individual jurisdictions that comprise 5% or more of total income taxes paid, net of refunds received. The ASU also includes other amendments to improve the effectiveness of income tax disclosures. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The transition method is prospective with retrospective method permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on disclosures.

Free Sentinel

Want the next Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.