Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2023-09 on income taxes which requires entities to provide additional information in the rate reconciliation and additional disaggregated disclosures about income taxes paid. This guidance requires public entities to disclose in their rate reconciliation table additional categories of information about federal, state, and foreign income taxes and to provide more details about the reconciling items in some categories if the items meet a quantitative threshold. The guidance was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted this guidance for the year ended December 31, 2025 and applied the guidance prospectively. For further information, see Note 19.

New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-07 on derivatives and hedging and revenue from contracts with customers. The amendment provides clarity on application of derivative accounting to certain nonexchange-traded contracts with features based on operations or activities of one of the parties to the contract. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those periods and can be applied on a prospective or modified retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06 on internal-use software related to accounting for internal-use software costs. The amendment in this update improve the operability of the guidance by clarifying the criteria for capitalization, which begins when both of the following occur: (1) management has authorized and committed to funding the software project and (2) it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those periods. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance can be applied on a fully prospective basis, a modified basis for in-process projects, or a full retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03 on income statement presentation to require disclosure, in the notes to the financial statements, of disaggregated information about certain costs and expenses, including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, and depreciation and amortization included in each relevant expense caption within continuing operations. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 25, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 12, 2024
2022Feb 13, 2023
2021Feb 14, 2022
2020Feb 12, 2021
2019Feb 14, 2020
2018Feb 15, 2019
2017Feb 16, 2018
2016Feb 17, 2017
2015Feb 19, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.