FATE THERAPEUTICS INC Leases Disclosure
8. Leases
The Company has lease agreements for office, laboratory and manufacturing spaces that are classified as operating leases on the consolidated balance sheets. These leases have original terms varying from six to approximately sixteen years, with renewal options of up to ten years, as well as early termination options. Extension and termination options are included in the total lease term when the Company is reasonably certain to exercise them. The leases are subject to additional variable charges, including common area maintenance, property taxes, property insurance and other variable costs. Given the variable nature of such costs, they are recognized as expense as incurred. Additionally, some of the Company’s leases are subject to certain fixed fees which the Company has determined to be non-lease components. The Company has elected to combine and account for lease and non-lease components as a single-lease component for purposes of determining the total future lease payments.
In October 2024, the Company exercised its right of early termination for its Torrey Pines operating lease, which consists of 72,000 square feet of office, laboratory, and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) space. In connection with such exercise, the Company paid $2.5 million to its landlord during the year ended December 31, 2024. Termination of the lease, which previously extended through December 31, 2028, took effect on October 31, 2025.
As of December 31, 2025, future undiscounted minimum contractual payments under the Company’s operating leases were $119.3 million, which will be paid over a remaining weighted-average lease term of 10.1 years. The weighted-average discount rate for the operating lease liabilities was 8.5%, which was the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at lease commencement, as the discount rates implicit in the leases could not be readily determined.
The components of lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended |
|
|||||
|
|
2025 |
|
|
2024 |
|
||
Straight-line lease expense |
|
$ |
11,844 |
|
|
$ |
12,737 |
|
Variable lease expense |
|
|
3,186 |
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
Total operating lease expense |
|
$ |
15,030 |
|
|
$ |
16,470 |
|
Future undiscounted minimum payments under the Company’s operating leases as of December 31, 2025 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Years Ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2026 |
|
$ |
11,050 |
|
2027 |
|
|
11,382 |
|
2028 |
|
|
10,293 |
|
2029 |
|
|
10,602 |
|
2030 |
|
|
10,920 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
65,056 |
|
Total undiscounted lease payments |
|
$ |
119,303 |
|
Less: imputed interest |
|
|
(41,454 |
) |
Total lease liability |
|
$ |
77,849 |
|
As described in Note 1 above, the Company incurred a $1.3 million impairment charge against its right-of-use asset during the year ended December 31, 2024. The Company applied a discounted cash flow method to estimate the fair value of the right-of-use asset, which represents Level 3 non-recurring fair value measurements. The estimated fair value of the was determined by discounting the estimated rental rates using market participant assumptions. No such expense was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2025. The Company’s estimates and assumptions used to determine the estimated fair value of the asset group is subject to risks, uncertainties, and changes in circumstances that may result in adjustments and material changes to the estimated fair values in future periods.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 26, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2023 | Feb 26, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 28, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 28, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Feb 24, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 2, 2020 | |
About Leases Disclosures
Lease disclosures under ASC 842 provide a comprehensive view of a company's leased asset portfolio, including the split between operating and finance leases, discount rates used to present-value future payments, and the maturity schedule of lease obligations. This section reveals a significant source of off-balance-sheet commitments that were largely hidden before the current standard.
Key signals: the weighted-average discount rate affects the size of recorded lease liabilities — a higher rate reduces the reported obligation, so compare the chosen rate against the company's incremental borrowing rate. The operating versus finance lease mix affects both EBITDA and operating income presentation. Watch the maturity table for concentration risk: large payment cliffs in specific years may create cash flow pressure. Variable lease payments excluded from the liability measurement represent real obligations that do not appear on the balance sheet. Compare total lease costs against prior-year operating lease expense to assess the true economic burden.