Recent Accounting Pronouncements—In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-06, Disclosure Improvements – Codification Amendments in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative. This ASU incorporates certain Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) disclosure requirements related to various subtopics into the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This standard is effective for each subtopic amendment on the date that the SEC removes the related disclosure requirement from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K, with early adoption prohibited. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2025, and it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. This ASU enhances the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures by expanding the disclosures of an entity’s income tax rate reconciliation and disaggregation of income taxes paid and income tax expense. This standard is effective prospectively for all public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption and retrospective application permitted. We adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of 2025 prospectively, which included expanded income tax disclosures in Note 15.
Unadopted Accounting Pronouncements

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 16, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 13, 2025
2023Mar 27, 2024
2022Mar 9, 2023

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.