Note 23. Commitments and Contingencies

Self-insurance reserves and other commitments and contingencies

The company has recorded current liabilities of $37.2 million and $34.4 million related to self-insurance reserves at January 3, 2026 and December 28, 2024, respectively. The reserves include an estimate of expected settlements on pending claims, defense costs and a provision for claims incurred but not reported. These estimates are based on the company’s assessment of potential liability using an analysis of available information with respect to pending claims, historical experience and current cost trends.

In the event the company ceases to utilize the independent distributor model or exits a geographic market, the company is contractually required in some situations to purchase the distribution rights from the independent distributor. The company expects to continue operating under this model and has concluded that the possibility of a loss is remote.

The company’s facilities are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding the discharge of material into the environment and the protection of the environment in other ways. The company is not a party to any material proceedings arising under these regulations. The company believes that compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations will not materially affect the consolidated financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or the competitive position of the company. The company believes it is currently in substantial compliance with all material environmental regulations affecting the company and its properties.

Litigation

The company and its subsidiaries from time to time are parties to, or targets of, lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including personal injury, commercial, contract, environmental, antitrust, product liability, health and safety and employment matters, which are being handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. While the company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters, it believes, based upon currently available facts, that it is remote that the ultimate resolution of any such pending matters will have a material adverse effect on its overall financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in the future. However, adverse developments could negatively impact earnings in a particular future fiscal period.

At this time, the company is defending ten complaints filed by IDPs alleging that they were misclassified as independent contractors. Six of these lawsuits seek class and/or collective action treatment. The remaining four cases either allege individual claims or do not seek class or collective action treatment or, in cases in which class treatment was sought, the court denied class certification. The respective courts have ruled on plaintiffs’ motions for class certification in two of the pending cases, which are discussed below.

Unless otherwise noted, a class was conditionally certified under the FLSA in each of the cases described below, although the company has the ability to petition the court to decertify that class at a later date:

 

Case Name

 

Case No.

 

Venue

 

Date Filed

 

Status

Martins v. Flowers Foods, Inc.,
Flowers Baking Co. of Bradenton,
LLC and Flowers Baking Co.
of Villa Rica, LLC

 

8:16-cv-03145

 

U.S. District Court Middle
District of Florida

 

11/8/2016

 

On November 25, 2024, the court denied defendants' motion to decertify the FLSA collective action.

Salgado v. Flowers Foods, Inc. and Holsum Bakery, Inc.

 

4:22-cv-00420

 

U.S. District Court District of Arizona

 

9/15/2022

 

 

 

The company and/or its respective subsidiaries contests the allegations and are vigorously defending all of these lawsuits. Given the stage of the complaints and the claims and issues presented, except for lawsuits disclosed herein that have reached a settlement or agreement in principle, the company cannot reasonably estimate at this time the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from the unresolved lawsuits.

The company has settled, and the appropriate court has approved, the following collective and/or class action lawsuits filed by distributors alleging that such distributors were misclassified as independent contractors. In each of these settlements, in addition to the monetary terms noted below, the settlements also included certain non-economic terms intended to strengthen and enhance the independent contractor model. The list below details settled collective and/or class action lawsuits that impacted the company's presented financial statements since Fiscal 2023:

 

Case Name

 

Case No.

 

Venue

 

Date Filed

 

Comments

Ludlow et al. v. Flowers Foods, Inc., Flowers Bakeries, LLC and Flowers Finance, LLC

 

3:18-cv-01190

 

U.S. District Court Southern District of California

 

6/6/2018

 

On March 18, 2024, the court approved a settlement to settle this lawsuit and two companion cases – Maciel et al. v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al., No. 3:20-cv-02059-JO-JLB (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California) and Maciel v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al., No. 20-CIV-02959 (Superior Court of San Mateo County, California). The settlement provides for a $55 million common fund, which was paid during the second quarter of Fiscal 2024, to cover settlement payments to a class of approximately 475 plaintiffs, service awards, attorneys’ fees and settlement administration expenses. The settlement also required a phased repurchase of distribution rights associated with approximately 350 territories in California. The company now services its California market with an employment model. The repurchase of distribution rights was completed in the second quarter of Fiscal 2025. The repurchase cost of the 350 territories, along with 50 additional California territories that are not part of the settlement, was $79.0 million (of which $65.3 million was originally included in other accrued liabilities and the remaining $14.9 million in a contra account to notes receivable). These amounts were recorded in the selling, distribution, and administrative expenses line item of the Consolidated Statements of Income during Fiscal 2023, net of an adjustment recorded during the first quarter of Fiscal 2025 of $1.2 million.

 

See Note 15, Debt and Other Commitments, for additional information on the company’s commitments.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026Feb 25, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 18, 2025
2023Feb 21, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2022
2021Feb 24, 2021
2019Feb 19, 2020
2018Feb 20, 2019
2017Feb 21, 2018
2016Feb 23, 2017

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.