Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In 2025, we adopted ASU 2023-05, which requires certain joint ventures to apply a new basis of accounting upon formation by recognizing and initially measuring most of their assets and liabilities at fair value. The guidance does not apply to joint ventures that may be proportionately consolidated and those that are collaborative arrangements. The adoption did not have any impact on our consolidated results.
In 2025, we adopted ASU 2023-09 on a prospective basis. This ASU requires us to disclose income taxes paid, net of refunds, disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes and to provide more details in our rate reconciliation about items that meet a quantitative threshold. The adoption did not have any impact on our consolidated results.
During 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03 on the disaggregation of income statement expenses or "DISE." This ASU requires additional footnote disclosure of the details of certain income statement expense line items, without changing amounts reported on the consolidated income statement. ASU 2024-03 is first effective for our annual reporting for 2027 and for our quarterly reporting beginning in 2028. We do not expect this ASU to have any impact on our consolidated results.
In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03 on identifying the accounting acquirer in transactions involving VIEs. This ASU revises the guidance to require consideration of the same factors used in other business combinations when the legal acquiree is a VIE that qualifies as a business and the transaction is effected primarily through the exchange of equity interests. ASU 2025-03 is effective for our annual and quarterly reporting for 2027. We do not expect this ASU to have any impact on our consolidated results.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05 on measurement of credit losses for accounts receivable and contract assets. This ASU introduces a practical expedient allowing us to assume that conditions at the balance sheet date remain unchanged over the life of these assets. ASU 2025-05 is effective prospectively for our annual and quarterly reporting for 2026. We do not expect this ASU to have any impact on our consolidated results.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06 to make targeted improvements to the guidance on internal use software. This ASU removes all references to project stages in ASC 350-40 and clarifies the threshold entities apply to begin capitalizing costs. ASU 2025-06 is effective for our annual and quarterly reporting for 2028 and may be applied using a prospective, retrospective or modified transition approach. We are assessing any impact this ASU may have on our consolidated results.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑11 on interim reporting. This ASU clarifies when interim reporting requirements apply, standardizes the form and content of interim financial statements and notes, and introduces a disclosure principle requiring entities to report events occurring after year end that have a material impact. ASU 2025‑11 is effective for our annual and quarterly reporting for 2028. We do not expect this ASU to have any impact on our consolidated results.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 17, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 18, 2025
2023Feb 20, 2024
2022Feb 21, 2023
2021Feb 22, 2022
2020Feb 26, 2021
2019Sep 25, 2020
2018Feb 21, 2019
2017Feb 20, 2018
2016Feb 17, 2017
2015Feb 18, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.