Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Codification Improvements. In March 2024, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2024-02, “Codification Improvements - Amendments to Remove References to the Concepts Statements.” ASU No. 2024-02 removes references to various FASB Concepts Statements within the Codification. In the first quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company adopted ASU No. 2024-02 on a prospective basis. The adoption of ASU No. 2024-02 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
Income Taxes. In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740).” The amendments in this ASU improve the transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. Additionally, this ASU improves the effectiveness and comparability of disclosures by adding disclosures of pretax income (or loss) and income tax expense (or benefit) to be consistent with SEC Regulation S-X §210.4-08(h) and by removing disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial or relevant. In fiscal 2025, the Company adopted ASU No. 2023-09 on a retrospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the standard only impacts financial statement footnote disclosures. For additional information, refer to Note 6, “Income Taxes.”
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Interim Reporting. In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, “Interim Reporting (Topic 270).” ASU 2025-11 clarifies interim disclosure requirements and the applicability of Topic 270. This ASU adds a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures, clarifies the form and content of interim financial statements, and requires disclosure of events since the end of the previous annual reporting period that materially affect the entity. The guidance in ASU 2025-11 is effective for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-11 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Internal-Use Software. In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40).” ASU 2025-06 modernizes the guidance for accounting for internal-use software costs by removing references to project stages and clarifying the threshold applied to begin capitalizing costs. The guidance in ASU 2025-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027 and interim periods within those fiscal years, and can be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or using a modified transition approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-06 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40).” ASU 2024-03 improves disclosures about expenses by requiring disaggregated disclosure, in the notes to the financial statements, of relevant expense captions within the income statement. The guidance in ASU No. 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2024-03 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Presentation and Disclosure Requirements. In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-06, “Disclosure Improvements - Codification Amendments in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative.” The ASU amends the disclosure or presentation requirements related to various subtopics in the FASB ASC. The ASU was issued in response to the SEC’s August 2018 final amendments in Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, that updated and simplified disclosure requirements that the SEC believed were duplicative, overlapping, or outdated. The guidance in ASU 2023-06 is intended to align GAAP requirements with those of the SEC and to facilitate the application of GAAP for all entities. The amendments introduced by ASU 2023-06 are effective if the SEC removes the related disclosure or presentation requirement from its existing regulations by June 30, 2027. If, by June 30, 2027, the SEC has not removed the applicable requirements from its existing regulations, the pending content of the associated amendment will be removed from the ASC and will not become effective for any entities. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2023-06 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 19, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 20, 2025
2023Feb 22, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 24, 2022
2020Feb 25, 2021
2019Feb 20, 2020
2018Feb 25, 2019
2017Mar 5, 2018

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.