Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements

The Company has certain financial assets which have been classified as either Level 1, 2, or 3 within the fair value hierarchy as described below.

Level 1 — Fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Fair value based on inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 — Fair value based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and such inputs are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2025

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds (1)

 

$

64,743

 

 

$

 

 

$

64,743

 

Marketable investments (3)

 

 

 

 

 

16,722

 

 

 

16,722

 

Total Assets

 

$

64,743

 

 

$

16,722

 

 

$

81,465

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2024

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds (2)

 

$

52,395

 

 

$

 

 

$

52,395

 

Marketable investments (3)

 

 

 

 

 

12,180

 

 

 

12,180

 

Total Assets

 

$

52,395

 

 

$

12,180

 

 

$

64,575

 

(1)
U.S. based funds of $17.1 million are included in cash and cash equivalents and non-U.S. based funds of $47.6 million are included in marketable investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)
U.S. based funds of $16.0 million are included in cash and cash equivalents and non-U.S. based funds of $36.4 million are included in marketable investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(3)
Marketable investments have been initially valued at the transaction price and subsequently valued, at the end of the reporting period, utilizing third party pricing services or other market observable data. The pricing services utilize industry standard valuation methods, including both income and market based approaches and observable market inputs to determine value. These observable market inputs include reportable trades, benchmark yields, credit spreads, broker/dealer quotes, bids, offers, current spot rates and other industry and economic events.

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company did not transfer assets between levels of the fair value hierarchy. Additionally, there have been no changes to the valuation techniques for Level 2 assets.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 13, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 7, 2025
2023Mar 8, 2024
2022Mar 10, 2023
2021Mar 10, 2022
2020Mar 11, 2021
2019Mar 13, 2020
2018Mar 8, 2019

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.