NOTE 14 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Litigation and Other Loss Contingencies

 

The Company records liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, penalties and other sources when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company has no liabilities recorded for loss contingencies as of December 31, 2025. 

 

The Company through its United Kingdom subsidiary is registered for Value Added Tax (“VAT”) in the United Kingdom under the accrual accounting scheme. Under this scheme, VAT output tax becomes due when invoices are issued, irrespective of cash settlement.

 

As of the reporting date, management has identified that the settlement of certain existing liabilities could give rise to an obligation to remit additional VAT to HM Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) in respect of VAT already invoiced or collected.

 

The amount of any such payment cannot be reliably estimated at this time, and the likelihood of settlement remains uncertain. Accordingly, no provision has been recognized in the financial statements. Management will continue to monitor this situation and will make further disclosures or recognize a liability when the settlement becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated. 

 

Legal Matters

 

Declaratory Relief Action Against the Company by AmTrust International

 

On June 29, 2022, AmTrust International Underwriters DAC (“AmTrust”), which was the premerger directors’ and officers’ insurance policy underwriter for KBL, filed a declaratory relief action against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Declaratory Relief Action”) seeking a declaration that AmTrust is not obligated to reimburse the Company for fees advanced by the Company to Dr. Krauss and George Hornig under the directors’ and officers’ insurance policy.

 

On, and effective on, April 6, 2025 (the “Effective Date”), the Company entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release (the “AmTrust Settlement Agreement”) with AmTrust, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. (“AFSI”). Pursuant to the AmTrust Settlement Agreement, the Company and AmTrust agreed to resolve the ongoing litigation and disputes discussed above, relating to the Company’s pre-merger directors’ and officers’ insurance policy (the “Coverage Action”).

 

Pursuant to the terms of the AmTrust Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to (i) pay AmTrust a cash payment of $0.3 million (the “Settlement Sum”) within 20 days of the Effective Date, which was paid prior to December 31, 2025, and (ii) issue AFSI 50,971 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “AmTrust Settlement Shares”), within three business days of the Effective Date, which were issued. The AmTrust Settlement Shares had a fair value of $0.4 million (the “Shares Value”), based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Effective Date, and are subject to customary anti-dilution protections, including adjustments for stock splits, combinations, and stock dividends. The Company recognized a loss on settlement of $0.7 million included within “General and administrative expenses” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the year ended December 31, 2025 relating to the AmTrust Settlement Agreement.

 

Within ten days after delivery of both the Settlement Sum and the AmTrust Settlement Shares, the parties agreed to file a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice of the Coverage Action, which was filed and granted on April 30, 2025.

 

In connection with the settlement, the Company and AmTrust provided each other broad mutual releases of all claims, known and unknown, arising out of or relating to, among other things, the Coverage Action, certain claims relating to an SEC investigation of certain of the Company’s pre-merger officers, including Dr. Krauss, a lawsuit filed by the Company against Dr. Krauss, certain cross claims made by the Company against AmTrust, and related insurance claims and matters, including any claims for bad faith, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, or alleged unfair insurance practices. These releases extend to affiliates, officers, directors, employees, agents, and other related parties of both entities. The AmTrust Settlement Agreement expressly provides that it does not release the parties from obligations arising under the AmTrust Settlement Agreement itself.

In connection with the issuance of the AmTrust Settlement Shares and pursuant to the AmTrust Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to provide AFSI with certain registration rights. Specifically, the Company was obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to file a registration statement on Form S-1 (or Form S-3, if available) with the SEC within 45 days of the Effective Date (i.e., prior to May 21, 2025) to register the resale of the AmTrust Settlement Shares (the “Resale Registration Statement”) and use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Resale Registration Statement to be declared effective within 60 days following the Effective Date, or, in the event of SEC notice that the Registration Statement will not be reviewed, by the third business day thereafter, which Resale Registration Statement was timely filed and became effective within the time period set forth in the AmTrust Settlement Agreement.

 

The Company is required to keep the Resale Registration Statement continuously effective until such time as AFSI no longer holds any AmTrust Settlement Shares, and to bear all related costs and expenses in connection with such registration, excluding AFSI’s legal fees. Additionally, the Company must provide legal opinion coverage at its expense, if necessary, to enable AFSI to rely on Rule 144 resale exemptions after six months.

 

If the prospectus included in the Resale Registration Statement can no longer be relied upon, or if the Company fails to maintain the effectiveness of the Resale Registration Statement (each, a “Registration Statement Failure Event”), the Company is required to pay liquidated damages equal to 3.0% of the Shares Value for each such failure and for each month such failure continues, subject to a cap of 33.0% of the Shares Value.

 

Elray and Luxor Settlement Agreement

 

On April 28, 2025, the Company entered into a Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement (the “Elray Settlement Agreement”) with Elray, and Luxor Capital, LLC (“Luxor”). Elray and Luxor are both controlled by Anthony Brian Goodman, the father of the Company’s then director, Jay Goodman. The Elray Settlement Agreement and related arrangements discussed below resolved certain disputes which had arisen between the parties relating to among other things, certain potential acquisitions.

 

Pursuant to the Elray Settlement Agreement: (a) the Company agreed to acquire all 131,800 of the shares of its common stock (the “Elray Shares”) held by Elray, which were issued in March 2025, upon the conversion of 1,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock which Elray then held (representing 23.1% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock), in exchange for an aggregate settlement payment of $1.0 million, consisting of (i) $0.4 million payable to Elray within five business days of the Elray Settlement Agreement (the “Elray Payment”), which was paid, and (ii) $0.7 million payable to Luxor (“Luxor Payment”). Amounts due to Luxor will be payable by way of 20% of the proceeds raised by the Company in future capital raises until paid in full, but shall be paid no later than April 28, 2026 which payments have been paid to date); and (b) the Company, Elray, and Luxor exchanged mutual general releases from claims arising from prior negotiations and agreements, with limited exceptions for obligations under the Elray Settlement Agreement and confidentiality requirements.

 

In connection with the settlement, Elray agreed to deliver five stock powers authorizing cancellation of the Elray Shares, to be held in escrow and released proportionally at the option of the Company, as settlement payments are made, with all remaining shares canceled once the full amounts of the Elray Payment and Luxor Payment are made. The stock powers are to be released in tranches, with the stock power relating to the initial 46,130 Elray Shares eligible to be released from escrow upon payment of the Elray Payment, and the remaining four stock powers, each providing for the transfer of 21,418 shares, to be released upon the payment by the Company to Luxor of each additional $0.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2025 the Elray Shares were returned to the Company and cancelled.

 

Luxor also agreed to indemnify the Company against any claims brought by a third party related to certain prior negotiations involving an online casino asset acquisition.

The Elray Settlement Agreement included customary representations and warranties of the parties and confidentiality requirements. The Elray Settlement Agreement also provides a restriction on Elray’s sale or transfer of any of the Elray Shares.

 

The Elray Settlement Agreement also required Elray to enter into a Voting Agreement with the Company. Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, which was entered into on April 28, 2025, by Elray, the Company, and Blair Jordan, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer, solely for the benefit of the Company, Elray agreed to vote any Elray Shares which it continued to hold, as recommended by the Board of Directors of the Company, at any meeting of stockholders or via any written consent of stockholders, which may occur prior to April 28, 2026. In order to enforce the terms of the Voting Agreement, and solely for the benefit of the Company, Elray provided Mr. Jordan (or his assigns) an irrevocable voting proxy to vote the Elray Shares pursuant to the guidelines set forth above at any meeting of stockholders or via any written consent of stockholders.

 

The Elray Settlement Agreement and related transactions were approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, as well as the Company’s Audit Committee, with Mr. Jay Goodman (a then member of the Board of Directors) abstaining. The Elray Settlement Agreement was determined to be a forward purchase contract, and was recognized as a liability under ASC 480. The settlement payment was at a price per share below fair market value, and therefore no loss was recognized. The Company recognized the $1.0 million repurchase amount in treasury stock.

 

Indemnification Agreements

 

The Company has entered into Indemnity Agreements (each an “Indemnification Agreement”) with each of its directors and officers (each an “Indemnitee”), to provide for indemnification to the officers and directors under Delaware law. Among other things, consistent with the Company’s Bylaws, each Indemnification Agreement generally requires that the Company (i) indemnify the Indemnitee from and against all expenses and liabilities with respect to proceedings to which Indemnitee may be subject by reason of the Indemnitee’s service to the Company to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by Delaware law and (ii) advance all expenses incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with the investigation, defense, settlement or appeal of any proceeding, and in connection with any proceeding to enforce the Indemnitee’s rights under the Indemnification Agreement. The Indemnification Agreement also establishes various related procedures and processes and generally requires the Company to maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage.

 

Other Commitments

 

Woody Separation Agreement

 

On May 7, 2024, Dr. James N. Woody resigned as Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board of Directors and entered into a Separation and Release Agreement with the Company. In February 2025, the agreement was amended to provide for the issuance of restricted common stock in lieu of a contingent cash payment. All obligations under the amended separation agreement have been satisfied, and the related voting agreement expired during 2025.

 

Former Chief Executive Officer and Consulting Agreement

 

On September 4, 2025, the Company entered into a Separation and Release Agreement with Blair Jordan and Blair Jordan Strategy and Finance Consulting Inc. (the “Jordan Separation Agreement”). Pursuant to the Jordan Separation Agreement, the Company agreed to pay $1.4 million in cash and to provide certain releases and indemnification obligations.

 

The Company also agreed to grant 16,000 shares of restricted common stock to Jordan Consulting under the Company’s Third Amended and Restated 180 Life Sciences Corp. 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), with such shares evidenced and documented by a Notice of Restricted Stock Grant and Restricted Stock Grant Agreement entered into between Jordan Consulting and the Company, and subject to vesting as follows: (a) 8,000 shares vest on January 1, 2026, subject to Jordan Consulting and Mr. Jordan’s continued service to the Company on such vesting date; and (b) 8,000 shares vest on December 31, 2026, subject to Jordan Consulting and Mr. Jordan’s continued service to the Company on such vesting date, provided that the Board of Directors accelerated the vesting of all such shares on June 17, 2025. The Company recognized $0.2 million of stock-based compensation related to these shares during the year ended December 31, 2025. On September 4, 2025, Mr. Blair Jordan, the then Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jordan Consulting entered into a Separation and Release Agreement with the Company (the “Jordan Separation Agreement”).

 Executive Employment Agreement with McAndrew Rudisill

 

On September 15, 2025, the Company entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. McAndrew Rudisill, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman (the “Rudisill Employment Agreement”).

 

Pursuant to the Rudisill Employment Agreement, the Company agreed to continue to engage Mr. Rudisill as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, during the term of the agreement, which continues until the earlier of (i) Mr. Rudisill providing the Company 30 days written notice of his termination of the Rudisill Employment Agreement, or (ii) December 31, 2028; subject to up to two additional years of automatic renewals, if neither party provides the other intent of its non-renewal prior to December 31, 2028 or if automatically renewed, December 31, 2029.

 

In consideration for agreeing to provide services under the Rudisill Employment Agreement, the Company agreed: (a) to pay Mr. Rudisill a base salary of $0.5 million per year, with such amount to be reviewed by the Board with the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, at least annually, and may be increased if the Board deems appropriate; (b) that Mr. Rudisill would be eligible to earn an annual discretionary bonus as established by the Board or Compensation Committee, which may consist of restricted stock units (RSUs) and/or cash payments; and (c) that Mr. Rudisill would be entitled to a change of control payment, equal to two percent (2%) of the greater of (i) the market capitalization of the Company on the closing date of a Change in Control (as defined below) or (ii) the total enterprise value (defined by the Company’s market capitalization on the closing date of a Change of Control, plus all outstanding debt, less cash). This Change in Control payment may consist of both RSU’s and/or cash, as determined by the Board or Compensation Committee. For the purposes of the Rudisill Employment Agreement, a “Change in Control” means either (i) a merger or consolidation involving the Company (or one of its subsidiaries where the Company issues shares), unless the transaction is solely for changing the Company’s domicile or results in the Company’s stockholders retaining more than 50% of the voting power in the surviving or parent corporation immediately after the transaction, or (ii) the sale, lease, transfer, exclusive license, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ assets or equity, including through the sale or disposition of subsidiaries holding substantially all such assets, except where the transfer is to a wholly-owned subsidiary, provided that transactions carried out principally for bona fide equity financing purposes, where the Company receives cash or debt is cancelled or converted (or a combination thereof), will not constitute a Change in Control.

 

Separately, upon termination of the Rudisill Employment Agreement for any reason, the Company must promptly, and no later than 30 days after termination (or sooner if required by law), pay Mr. Rudisill (or his surviving spouse or estate) a lump sum covering any portion of his then current salary due through the termination date and reimbursement of eligible expenses incurred. Additionally, if Mr. Rudisill has been employed for more than 12 months, he will also receive a severance payment equal to two times his base salary at the time of termination. In addition, if his employment ends within 36 months of the start date (September 15, 2025), he will receive a payment, payable in stock and/or cash as determined by the Board, equal to the greater of (a) 1% of the Company’s market capitalization; or (b) 1% of the total enterprise value (market capitalization plus debt, less cash) of the Company, at the time of termination. Payment of these severance benefits are conditioned on Mr. Rudisill executing a general release of claims against the Board relating to his employment or service with the Company.

 

The Rudisill Employment Agreement also contains customary confidentiality obligations and work made for hire language. In addition, Mr. Rudisill is eligible to receive certain employee benefits, including profit sharing, medical, disability and life insurance plans and programs, that are established and made generally available by the Company from time to time to its employees, subject, however, to the applicable eligibility requirements and other provisions of such plans and programs (including, without limitation, requirements as to position, tenure, location, salary, age and health).

Notwithstanding the terms of the Rudisill Employment Agreement, as discussed above, the Board and/or Compensation Committee may from time to time, in their discretion, increase Mr. Rudisill’s base salary or award discretionary bonuses to Mr. Rudisill, which may take the form of cash consideration or equity.

 

The Rudisill Employment Agreement superseded the offer letter previously provided to Mr. Rudisill to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors.

 

Asset Management Agreement

 

In connection with the Private Placement, at the Closing (the “AMA Effective Date”), the Company entered into an Asset Management Agreement (the “Asset Management Agreement”) with Electric Treasury Edge, LLC (the “Asset Manager”). Pursuant to the Asset Management Agreement, the Asset Manager will provide discretionary investment management services with respect to, among other assets (including without limitation certain subsequently raised funds), the majority of the Company’s proceeds from the Private Placement (the “Account Assets”) in accordance with the terms of the Asset Management Agreement. The Asset Manager will pursue a long-bias strategy of digital assets primarily focused on Ethereum (the “ETH Strategy”). The custodians under the Asset Management Agreement will consist of cryptocurrency wallet providers mutually acceptable to the Company and the Asset Manager.

 

The Company shall pay the Asset Manager a monthly asset-based fee (the “Asset-based Fee”) equal to 2% per annum of the average daily net asset value of the Account Assets under management, payable in advance on the first business day of each calendar month; provided, however, that the minimum Asset-based Fee to be paid to the Asset Manager shall be $2.0 million per year. Fees are prorated for partial periods. Staked or liquid-staked assets are not treated differently for fee purposes. The Asset Manager will invoice the Company monthly and deduct fees directly from the account. The Asset-based Fee shall be calculated and invoiced to the Company by the Asset Manager in a commercially reasonable manner and in good faith, by reference to relevant prices on Coinbase taken at 12:00 UTC for each relevant day (or if not available, determined by the Asset Manager in a commercially reasonable manner and in good faith by reference to reputable industry sources). The Company also agreed to pay or reimburse the Asset Manager for all reasonable and documented expenses related to the operation of the account, which shall be paid or reimbursed by the Company out of the Account Assets.

 

The Asset Management Agreement will, unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, remain in effect until the fifth anniversary of the AMA Effective Date and shall thereafter automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless either party provides written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to renewal. Beginning on the first anniversary of the AMA Effective Date, the Company may terminate the Asset Management Agreement either (i) without cause upon at least 180 days’ prior written notice, subject to approval by at least eighty percent (80%) of the members of the Company’s board of directors and by at least 66-2/3% of the Company’s shareholders, or (ii) for cause (following an Asset Manager Cause Event) upon at least 60 days’ prior written notice. The Asset Manager may terminate the Agreement beginning on the first anniversary of the AMA Effective Date either (i) without cause upon at least 180 days’ prior written notice, or (ii) for cause (following a Company Cause Event) upon at least 30 days’ prior written notice. “Company Cause Events” include failure to pay fees (not cured within five business days), insolvency, or material breach (not cured within 30 business days, if curable). “Asset Manager Cause Events” include willful misconduct, gross negligence or fraud by the Asset Manager or material breaches that have a material adverse effect on the Company or the Account Assets (not cured within 30 business days, if curable), or insolvency.

 

If the Asset Management Agreement is terminated by the Company without an Asset Manager Cause Event, or by the Asset Manager for a Company Cause Event, prior to the fifth anniversary of the AMA Effective Date, the Asset Manager is entitled to liquidated damages in an amount equal to 85% of the fees and compensation that would have accrued through the fifth anniversary of the AMA Effective Date. In the event the Asset Management Agreement is terminated for an Asset Manager Cause Event by the Company, the Company shall be entitled to any and all damages and legal remedies arising from or in connection therewith including, but not limited to, direct, indirect, special, consequential, speculative and punitive damages, as well as lost future profits and business in the future.

 

If the Asset Manager becomes subject to a legal or regulatory order that prohibits it from carrying out its business as contemplated under the Asset Management Agreement, it must suspend performance and notify the Company. The parties have agreed to work together in good faith to amend the Asset Management Agreement or, if amendment is not possible, the Asset Management Agreement may be terminated upon five (5) days’ prior written notice. In such case, the Asset Manager is entitled to receive 100% of all unpaid fees and compensation accrued through the termination date.

Beginning with the AMA Effective Date, the Account Manager shall have the right to provide asset management services with respect to Account Assets that consist of at least 50% of the aggregate value of the Company’s assets until the value of the Company’s assets is $1.0 billion.

 

The Company and the Asset Manager have also agreed to negotiate in good faith either a separate and distinct asset management agreement or an amended and restated Asset Management Agreement, which provides for separate services related to the management of investments in securities or commodities with a substantially similar fee schedule, provided that the Asset Manager has obtained all requisite regulatory licenses and approvals necessary to provide such services, and further provided that the parties endeavor to avoid investments that would require the registration of the Company as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, which was subsequently entered into between the parties as discussed below.

 

The Asset Management Agreement includes customary confidentiality and indemnification provisions, representations, warranties and acknowledgements, for an agreement of the size and scope of the Asset Management Agreement.

 

On September 5, 2025, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Asset Management Agreement (the “A&R Asset Management Agreement”), which amended and restated the Asset Management Agreement. The A&R Asset Management Agreement makes certain changes to the Asset Management Agreement, including, among other things, the expansion of the scope of account assets and advisory services provided by the Asset Manager.

Free Sentinel

Want the next FORUM MARKETS Inc commitments disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment FORUM MARKETS Inc's next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Apr 1, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 31, 2025
2023Mar 25, 2024
2022Mar 31, 2023
2021Mar 31, 2022
2020Jul 9, 2021
2019Apr 7, 2020
2018Apr 1, 2019
2017Mar 29, 2018

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.