Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Except as noted below, the Company has considered all recent accounting pronouncements and concluded that there are no recent accounting pronouncements that may have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures, based on current information.
Accounting Pronouncement Recently Adopted
ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued accounting standards update ("ASU") No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The ASU is intended to improve the transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation, as well as income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. We adopted this ASU on a prospective basis for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for related disclosures.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
ASU No. 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The ASU is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring disaggregated disclosure of certain costs and expenses. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The ASU may be applied on either a prospective or retrospective basis. We are currently assessing the impact that this ASU will have on the Company's disclosures.
ASU No. 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. The ASU is intended to clarify and modernize the accounting for costs related to internal-use software. The ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The ASU may be applied using a prospective, retrospective, or modified transition approach. We are currently assessing the impact that this ASU will have on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
ASU No. 2025-09, Hedge Accounting Improvements
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-09, Hedge Accounting Improvements. The ASU is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of risk management activities. The ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The ASU should be applied on a prospective basis. We are currently assessing the impact that this ASU will have on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026Mar 17, 2026Showing above
2025Mar 18, 2025
2024Mar 19, 2024
2023Mar 14, 2023
2022Mar 15, 2022
2021Mar 16, 2021

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.