Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2023-09 - In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2023-09, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvement to Income Tax Disclosures," which is intended to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax information through improvements to income tax disclosures, primarily related to the rate reconciliation and information regarding income taxes paid. We adopted ASU 2023-09 effective December 31, 2025 and applied it retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. The adoption resulted in expanded disclosures of the components of the reconciliation between income tax expense and statutory expectations as well as expanded disclosures of income taxes paid. See "Note 12—Income Tax" for further information.
Recently issued accounting pronouncement not yet adopted

ASU 2025-09 - In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Hedge Accounting Improvements," which provides improvements to the guidance for five specific matters: (i) similar risk assessment for cash flow hedges, (ii) hedging interest payments on choose-your-rate debt, (iii) cash flow hedges of nonfinancial forecasted transactions, (iv) net written options as hedging instruments, and (v) foreign currency denominated debt instrument designated hedges. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively for all hedging relationships. We are evaluating the potential effects of ASU 2025-09 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

ASU 2025-06 - In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, "Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software," which simplifies the capitalization guidance by removing all references to software development project stages, so that the guidance is neutral to different software development methods. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied either retrospectively, prospectively to software costs incurred after the adoption date or on a modified prospective basis. We are evaluating the potential effects of ASU 2025-06 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

ASU 2024-03 - In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, "Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses," which requires disclosure in the notes to financial statements of specified information about certain costs and expenses. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied either prospectively to financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date of this update or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. We are evaluating the potential effects of ASU 2024-03 on our consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 20, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 14, 2025
2023Feb 14, 2024
2022Feb 17, 2023
2021Feb 18, 2022
2020Feb 19, 2021
2019Feb 21, 2020
2018Feb 21, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Jul 28, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.