Hayward Holdings, Inc.HAYW
Hayward Holdings, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Change in Accounting Principle
During the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company changed its presentation of warranty costs from selling, general and administrative expense to cost of sales within the consolidated statements of operations. The Company believes that this change in accounting principle is preferable as it better reflects the total cost of fulfilling its revenue transactions, improves comparability with other original equipment manufacturers and provides more meaningful information to users of its financial statements. This change in presentation has been applied retrospectively to all periods presented and affects cost of sales, gross profit and selling, general and administrative expense. This change in presentation has no impact to net sales, operating income, income from operations before income taxes, income tax expense, net income, net income per common share, retained earnings, other components of equity, net assets, or cash flows.Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Income Taxes
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which is intended to improve income tax disclosure requirements by requiring (i) consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and (ii) the disaggregation of income taxes paid by jurisdiction. The guidance makes several other changes to the income tax disclosure requirements. The amendments in ASU 2023-09 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be applied prospectively with the option of retrospective application. The Company has adopted the standard using a retrospective application for the year ended December 31, 2025. Refer to Note 8. for additional details regarding the Company’s income tax disclosures.
Reference Rate Reform
In March 2020, the FASB issued guidance that provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by the transition away from reference rates expected to be discontinued to alternative reference rates. The guidance was effective upon issuance and may be applied prospectively to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into on or before December 31, 2022. In December 2022, the FASB issued additional guidance deferring the sunset date of Topic 848 - Reference Rate Reform until December 31, 2024.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company completed the transition of its financial instruments and debt agreements effected by reference rate reform, including its existing First Lien Credit Agreement, to an alternative base rate instead of LIBOR. The adoption of this standard has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 9. for additional details regarding the Company’s amendments to its debt agreements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which includes requirements that an entity disclose in the notes to the financial statements specified information about certain costs and expenses, including the amounts of (a) purchases of inventory, (b) employee compensation, (c) depreciation and (d) intangible asset amortization included in each relevant expense caption presented on the statement of operations. The standard also requires disclosure of a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively, as well as the total amount of selling expenses and an entity’s definition of selling expenses. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of the standard on its disclosures.
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which modernizes the accounting for internal‑use software by eliminating references to prescriptive development stages and replacing them with a principles‑based capitalization model. Under the new approach, entities can begin capitalizing software development costs once management has authorized and committed funding and it is “probable to complete” (i.e. probable that the software will be completed and used), provided there is no “significant development uncertainty.” The update also aligns disclosure of capitalized internal software costs with those for property, plant, and equipment, and permits entities to adopt the standard via prospective, modified, or retrospective transition methods. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of the standard on its condensed financial statements and related disclosures.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 25, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 27, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 29, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 28, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 9, 2022 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.