ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS — In December, 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2023-09, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures". This ASU modifies the rules on income tax disclosures to require entities to disclose (1) specific categories in the rate reconciliation, (2) the income or loss from continuing operations before income tax expense or benefit (separated between domestic and foreign) and (3) income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations (separated by federal, state and foreign). This ASU also requires entities to disclose their income tax payments to international, federal, state and local jurisdictions, among other changes. This ASU takes effect in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU on January 1, 2025 resulted in additional disclosures to note #13 that quantified the impact each category in the rate reconciliation had on the statutory rate. The ASU was applied on a retrospective basis and did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December, 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses". This ASU requires public business entities to disaggregate certain expense captions into specific categories in disclosures within the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements. This ASU takes effect in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-08, "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Financial Assets". This ASU amends the accounting for purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) financial assets and non-purchased credit deteriorated ("non-PCD") financial assets under Topic 326. The amendments broaden the population of
financial assets that are within the scope of the gross-up approach under Topic 326 to include purchased seasoned loans ("PSL"), which are defined as non-PCD loans that are obtained in a business combination, or non-PCD loans that (1) are obtained in an asset acquisition or upon consolidation of a variable interest entity that is not a business and (2) are acquired more than 90 days after their origination date by a transferee that was not involved in their origination. This eliminates the day-one earnings impact that previously occurred for non-PCD loans. The ASU also requires separate presentation of the initial ACL for PSLs within the ACL rollforward. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU effective October 1, 2025 did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 6, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 7, 2025
2023Mar 8, 2024
2022Mar 3, 2023
2021Mar 4, 2022
2020Mar 5, 2021
2019Mar 6, 2020
2018Mar 7, 2019
2017Mar 7, 2018
2016Mar 7, 2017
2015Mar 7, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.