Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.

Income Taxes

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued updated guidance to enhance the transparency of income tax disclosure by requiring disaggregated information about an entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation, as well as information on taxes paid. This updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted this standard prospectively by disaggregating the effective tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. Refer to Note 16 for more details.

Income Statement Disaggregation

In November 2024, the FASB issued updated guidance ASU 2024-03, to improve the disaggregation of income statement expenses. This guidance requires additional disclosure of certain amounts included in the expense captions presented on the statement of operations as well as disclosures about selling expenses. The ASU is effective on a prospective basis, with the option for retrospective application, for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted for annual financial statements that have not yet been issued. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 6, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 13, 2025
2023Mar 8, 2024
2022Mar 10, 2023
2021Mar 11, 2022
2020Mar 12, 2021
2019Mar 11, 2020
2018Mar 15, 2019
2017Mar 16, 2018
2016Mar 15, 2017
2015Mar 10, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.