Inuvo, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires an annual tabular effective tax rate reconciliation disclosure including information for specified categories and jurisdiction levels, as well as, disclosure of income taxes paid, net of refunds received, disaggregated by federal, state/local, and significant foreign jurisdiction. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The adoption has an impact on disclosures with no impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows, nor financial position.
In March 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires additional disclosures of the nature of certain expenses within income statement captions. The standard introduces a tabular disclosure of specified natural expense categories (e.g., inventory purchases, employee compensation, depreciation, amortization) included within relevant line items on the face of the income statement, along with qualitative descriptions of remaining amounts. It also requires disclosure of certain expense, gain, or loss amounts already required under U.S. GAAP and the total amount of selling expenses, including the definition of selling expenses in annual periods. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The adoption will affect disclosures only and is not expected to impact our consolidated results of operations, cash flows, or financial position.
In September 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which modernizes guidance for internal-use software costs and relocates the website development-costs guidance (previously in Subtopic 350-50) into Subtopic 350-40. The amendments require enhanced disclosures for capitalized software costs under ASC 350-40 and ASC 360-10, effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The adoption is expected to affect disclosures only and is not anticipated to impact our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In July 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2025-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Clarifying the Scope of the Current Expected Credit Losses Model, which clarifies the application of the CECL model to accounts receivable and certain other financial assets. We adopted ASU 2025-05 during the year ended December 31, 2025. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows, or financial position.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 5, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 27, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 29, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 10, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Feb 11, 2021 | |
| 2019 | May 12, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 15, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Feb 8, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Feb 16, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Feb 12, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.