Jaguar Health, Inc. Fair Value Disclosure
3. Fair Value Measurements
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under US GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:
The following tables set forth the fair value of the Company’s consolidated financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
|
|
December 31, 2024 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
Iliad |
|
$ |
|
— |
|
|
$ |
|
— |
|
|
$ |
|
5,215 |
|
|
$ |
|
5,215 |
|
Uptown |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
9,615 |
|
|
|
|
9,615 |
|
Streeterville 2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
8,673 |
|
|
|
|
8,673 |
|
Streeterville Note |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
11,853 |
|
|
|
|
11,853 |
|
Total fair value |
|
$ |
|
— |
|
|
$ |
|
— |
|
|
$ |
|
35,356 |
|
|
$ |
|
35,356 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2023 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
Iliad |
|
$ |
|
— |
|
|
$ |
|
— |
|
|
$ |
|
6,862 |
|
|
$ |
|
6,862 |
|
Uptown |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
7,473 |
|
|
|
|
7,473 |
|
Streeterville 2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
6,815 |
|
|
|
|
6,815 |
|
Streeterville Note |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
9,793 |
|
|
|
|
9,793 |
|
Total fair value |
|
$ |
|
— |
|
|
$ |
|
— |
|
|
$ |
|
30,943 |
|
|
$ |
|
30,943 |
|
The change in the estimated fair value of Level 3 liabilities is summarized below:
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
December 31, 2024 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Iliad |
|
|
Uptown |
|
|
Streeterville 2 |
|
|
Streeterville |
|
||||||||
Beginning fair value of Level 3 liability |
|
$ |
|
6,862 |
|
|
$ |
|
7,473 |
|
|
$ |
|
6,815 |
|
|
$ |
|
9,793 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Exchanges |
|
|
|
(4,906 |
) |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
— |
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
Ending fair value of Level 3 liability |
|
$ |
|
5,215 |
|
|
$ |
|
9,615 |
|
|
$ |
|
8,673 |
|
|
$ |
|
11,853 |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Iliad |
|
|
Uptown |
|
|
Streeterville 2 |
|
|
Streeterville |
|
||||||||
Beginning fair value of Level 3 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
7,839 |
|
|||
Additions |
|
|
|
6,580 |
|
|
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
|
6,154 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Exchanges |
|
|
|
(789 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,444 |
) |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
Ending fair value of Level 3 liability |
|
$ |
|
6,862 |
|
|
$ |
|
7,473 |
|
|
$ |
|
6,815 |
|
|
$ |
|
9,793 |
|
The fair value of the Streeterville Note recognized as a Level 3 liability at the date of issuance and as of December 31, 2024 amounted to $7.8 million and $11.9 million, respectively. The fair value of the remaining Level 3 liabilities at the extinguishment date and as of December 31, 2024 amounted to $21.1 million and $23.5 million. The fair values were based on the weighted average discounted expected future cash flows representing the terms of the notes, discounting them to their present value equivalents. The notes were classified as Level 3 fair values in the fair value hierarchy due to the use of unobservable inputs, including the Company’s own credit risk.
The Company determined and performed the valuations with the assistance of an independent valuation service provider. On a quarterly basis, the Company considers the main Level 3 inputs for hybrid instruments used derived as follows:
The following table summarizes the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurement for the Streeterville Note:
|
|
Range of Inputs |
|
|
||
|
|
(probability-weighted average) |
|
Relationship of unobservable inputs |
||
Unobservable Inputs |
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
|
to fair value |
Risk Adjusted Discount Rate |
|
7.46%-25.53% (25.53%) |
|
9.02%-24.59% (24.59%) |
|
If discount rate is adjusted to a total of an additional 100 basis points (bps), fair value would have decreased by $464,000. |
Sales Proceeds: Amount of comparable TDPRV |
|
$67.5 million to $350 million ($100 million) |
|
$67.5 million to $350 million ($100 million) |
|
If expected cash flows by Management considered the highest amount of market indications for vouchers, FV would have decreased by $1.64 million. |
Range of Probability for Timing of Cash Flows: |
|
0.00%-85.00% |
|
0.10%-73.27% |
|
If expected cash flows by Management considered the Scenario with the least amount of indicated value, FV would have decreased by $6.78 million. |
For the additional notes designated at FVO that are freestanding, the Company considers only the discount rate which was determined using a comparison of various effective yields on bonds as of valuation date.
The following table summarizes the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurement for the remaining instruments that are not classified as hybrid instruments:
|
|
Range of Inputs |
|
|
||
|
|
(probability-weighted average) |
|
Relationship of unobservable inputs |
||
Unobservable Inputs |
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
|
to fair value |
Risk Adjusted Discount Rate |
|
7.5%-27.53% (27.53%) |
|
9.02%-26.59% (26.59%) |
|
If discount rate is adjusted to a total of an additional 100 basis points (bps), fair value would have decreased by $397,000. |
Fair Value Option
The Company elected to apply the FVO accounting to certain freestanding instruments and to the entire class of hybrid instruments, including structured notes, of which there are assessed embedded derivatives that would be eligible for bifurcation, to align the measurement attributes of those instruments under US GAAP and to simplify the accounting model applied to these financial instruments.
The valuations of these instruments were predominantly driven by the discount rate and the derivative features embedded within the instruments. The Company determined and performed the valuations of the freestanding and hybrid instruments with the assistance of an independent valuation service provider. The valuation methodology utilized is consistent with the income approach for estimating the fair value of the interest-bearing portion of the instruments and the related derivatives. Cash flows of the financial instruments in their entirety, including the embedded derivatives, are discounted at an appropriate rate for the applicable duration of the instrument.
Interests on the interest-bearing portion of the instruments held to maturity and mark-to-market adjustments are aggregated in the change in fair value of freestanding and hybrid financial instruments designated at FVO in the consolidated statements of operations.
For the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company did not note any fair value movement on FVO liabilities attributable to any instrument-specific credit risk, which should be recorded in other comprehensive income (loss).
The following tables summarize the fair value and outstanding balance for items the Company accounts for under FVO:
(in thousands) |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance |
|
|
Accrued Interest |
|
|
Fair Value Over (Under) Outstanding Balance |
|
||||||||
At December 31, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Iliad |
|
$ |
|
5,215 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,220 |
|
|
$ |
|
4,484 |
|
|
$ |
|
(1,489 |
) |
Uptown |
|
|
|
9,615 |
|
|
|
|
7,994 |
|
|
|
|
5,347 |
|
|
|
|
(3,726 |
) |
Streeterville 2 |
|
|
|
8,673 |
|
|
|
|
10,094 |
|
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
|
(3,445 |
) |
Streeterville Note |
|
|
|
11,853 |
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
5,038 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance |
|
|
Accrued Interest |
|
|
Fair Value Over (Under) Outstanding Balance |
|
||||||||
At December 31, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Iliad |
|
$ |
|
6,862 |
|
|
$ |
|
7,292 |
|
|
$ |
|
3,621 |
|
|
$ |
|
(4,051 |
) |
Uptown |
|
|
|
7,473 |
|
|
|
|
7,994 |
|
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
|
(4,579 |
) |
Streeterville 2 |
|
|
|
6,815 |
|
|
|
|
10,273 |
|
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
(4,408 |
) |
Streeterville Note |
|
|
|
9,793 |
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
3,247 |
|
About Fair Value Disclosures
Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.
Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.