Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Standards
Accounting Standards Update 2023-09—Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (ASU 2023-09)
ASU 2023-09 requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity's effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. ASU 2023-09 requires disaggregation of the effective tax rate reconciliation at a threshold of 5% of our federal rate of 21%. Income taxes paid (net of refunds received) is required to be disaggregated by federal, state and foreign jurisdictions. The disaggregation is based on a quantitative threshold of 5% of total income taxes paid, net of refunds received. Income (loss) before income tax benefit (expense) is also required to be disaggregated between domestic and foreign jurisdictions. ASU 2023-09 eliminates the requirement to disclose details of tax positions for which the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may significantly increase or decrease in the next 12 months. The Company has adopted the standard effective December 31, 2025 on a prospective basis, and it did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Standards Effective in Future Years
Accounting Standards Update 2024-03 — Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income — Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (ASU 2024-03)
ASU 2024-03 requires entities to disclose disaggregated information regarding specific expense categories in the notes to the financial statements for both interim and annual periods. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The standard will be applied prospectively, with the option to apply on a retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the new standard but does not expect it to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Update 2025-06—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software (ASU 2025-06)
ASU 2025-06 updates the accounting guidance for internal-use software costs. The standard removes references to development stages and requires capitalization of software costs when management has authorized and committed to funding the software project, it is probable that the project will be completed, and the software will be used to perform the function intended. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. The standard may be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or using a modified transition method. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 12, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 14, 2025
2023Feb 12, 2024
2022Feb 27, 2023
2021Feb 22, 2022
2020Mar 2, 2021
2019Feb 18, 2020
2018Feb 21, 2019
2017Feb 16, 2018
2016Feb 17, 2017
2015Feb 17, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.