KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc. Fair Value Disclosure
Investments held for the Deferred Compensation Plan—The Company records the fair value of the investments and cash and cash equivalents held for the deferred compensation plan in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents held in the fund approximates fair value, and the amounts were not material as of January 3, 2026 and December 28, 2024. The investments held in the plan consist of mutual funds and money market funds with fair values that can be corroborated by prices for identical assets and therefore are classified as Level 1 investments under the fair value hierarchy. The following tables summarize the composition of the underlying investments in the Company's deferred compensation plan trust assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
Quoted Price |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Money Market Funds |
|
$ |
6,733 |
|
|
$ |
6,733 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Mutual Funds |
|
|
37,389 |
|
|
|
37,389 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
$ |
44,122 |
|
|
$ |
44,122 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
Quoted Price |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Money Market Funds |
|
$ |
6,499 |
|
|
$ |
6,499 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Mutual Funds |
|
|
31,432 |
|
|
|
31,432 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
$ |
37,931 |
|
|
$ |
37,931 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Refer to Note 5, Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets, Note 9, Other Assets, and Note 19, Employee Benefit Plans, for further information regarding the Company's deferred compensation plan.
Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets, and Long-Lived Assets—Fair value assessments of the reporting units and indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks utilized within the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests, respectively, are considered Level 3 measurements due to the significance of unobservable inputs developed using Company specific information. Specifically, during the fiscal year ended January 3, 2026, the market approach utilized for the quantitative goodwill impairment test incorporated Level 3 inputs including the application of a control premium, which is estimated using expected synergies that would be realized by a hypothetical buyer. Refer to Note 7, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, for additional detail regarding the goodwill impairment test.
The Company also measures long-lived assets, which includes property and equipment, lease ROU assets, and definite-lived intangible assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when events occur that indicate an asset group may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of an asset group is not recoverable, an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the carrying amount by the excess over its fair value. Fair value assessments performed for long-lived assets are considered a Level 3 measurement as the Company typically estimates fair value of the asset group using the DCF method under the income approach which is based on unobservable inputs including future cash flow projections, market-based inputs including as-is market rents, and discount rate assumptions, as appropriate.
In the fiscal years ended January 3, 2026, December 28, 2024, and December 30, 2023, triggering events at specific center asset groups related to property and equipment and lease ROU assets occurred as a result of lower-than-expected center sales performance, coupled with reduced forecasted cash flow projections over the remaining lease term or asset useful lives, as applicable. The Company identified specific center asset groups in the initial recoverability test that had carrying values in excess of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows. For those center asset groups, a fair value assessment was performed using the DCF method of the income approach to fair value and impairments of property and equipment and lease ROU assets were recognized.
The following table presents the amount of impairment expense of goodwill and long-lived assets (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
January 3, 2026 |
|
|
December 28, 2024 |
|
|
December 30, 2023 |
|
|||
Impairment of goodwill |
|
$ |
177,967 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Impairment of property and equipment |
|
|
22,806 |
|
|
|
7,202 |
|
|
|
11,426 |
|
Impairment of lease right-of-use assets |
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
2,134 |
|
Total impairment losses |
|
$ |
204,051 |
|
|
$ |
10,535 |
|
|
$ |
13,560 |
|
Refer to Note 6, Property and Equipment, Note 7, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, and Note 8, Leases, for additional information.
Contingent Consideration Payable—The Company measures contingent consideration payable at fair value based on a series of unobservable inputs, including the timing and probability of the occurrence of future events, and requires judgment from management. As such, contingent consideration payable is classified as Level 3. Significant market assumptions include a discount rate and the probability of the occurrence of specific events. Refer to Note 3, Acquisitions, for additional information related to the Company's contingent consideration payable.
The following table provides a roll forward of the fair value of recurring Level 3 fair value measurements (in thousands):
Balance at December 28, 2024 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Issuance of contingent consideration |
|
|
1,200 |
|
Balance at January 3, 2026 |
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments—The Company's derivative financial instruments include interest rate derivative contracts. The fair value of derivative financial instruments is determined using observable market inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments, forward pricing curves, and interest rates, and considers nonperformance risk of the Company and its counterparties, and as such, derivative financial instruments are classified as Level 2. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are subject to master netting arrangements that allow for the offset of assets and liabilities in the event of default or early termination of the contracts. The Company elects to record its derivative financial instruments at net fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 5, Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets, Note 9, Other Assets, Note 11, Other Current Liabilities, Note 13, Other Long-term Liabilities, and Note 14, Risk Management and Derivatives, for additional information regarding the Company’s derivative financial instruments.
Long-Term Debt—The Company records long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheets at adjusted cost, net of unamortized issuance costs. The estimated fair value of the First Lien Term Loan Facility was $938.0 million as of January 3, 2026 and $978.9 million as of December 28, 2024 and is based on mid-point prices, or prices for similar instruments from active markets, on the balance sheet date. Given the short-term nature of outstanding obligations on the First Lien Revolving Credit Facility, the carrying value approximates fair value. There were no outstanding borrowings on the First Lien Revolving Credit Facility as of January 3, 2026 or December 28, 2024. Judgment is required to develop these estimates, and as such, the First Lien Term Loan Facility and the First Lien Revolving Credit Facility are classified as Level 2.
Refer to Note 12, Long-term Debt, for additional information regarding the Company's long-term debt.
Other Financial Instruments—The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities.
There were no transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy during any of the periods presented.
About Fair Value Disclosures
Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.
Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.