KINDER MORGAN, INC. Leases Disclosure
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||
| (In millions) | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | $ | 74 | $ | 80 | $ | 71 | |||||||||||
| Short-term and variable leases | 152 | 131 | 127 | ||||||||||||||
| Total lease cost | $ | 226 | $ | 211 | $ | 198 | |||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except lease term and discount rate) | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | (158) | $ | (170) | $ | (157) | |||||||||||
| Investing cash flows from operating leases | (68) | (41) | (41) | ||||||||||||||
| ROU assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations, net of retirements | 25 | 36 | 56 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of ROU assets | 62 | 68 | 58 | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted average remaining lease term | 8.06 years | 8.15 years | 8.72 years | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted average discount rate | 4.85 | % | 4.84 | % | 4.59 | % | |||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| Lease Activity(a) | Balance sheet location | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| (In millions) | ||||||||||||||
| ROU assets | $ | 216 | $ | 253 | ||||||||||
| Short-term lease liability | 49 | 60 | ||||||||||||
| Long-term lease liability | 167 | 193 | ||||||||||||
| Year | Commitment | ||||
| (In millions) | |||||
| 2026 | $ | 59 | |||
| 2027 | 41 | ||||
| 2028 | 27 | ||||
| 2029 | 25 | ||||
| 2030 | 21 | ||||
| Thereafter | 105 | ||||
| Total lease payments | 278 | ||||
| Less: Interest | (62) | ||||
| Present value of lease liabilities | $ | 216 | |||
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 13, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 13, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 20, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 8, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 7, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Feb 5, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Feb 12, 2020 | |
About Leases Disclosures
Lease disclosures under ASC 842 provide a comprehensive view of a company's leased asset portfolio, including the split between operating and finance leases, discount rates used to present-value future payments, and the maturity schedule of lease obligations. This section reveals a significant source of off-balance-sheet commitments that were largely hidden before the current standard.
Key signals: the weighted-average discount rate affects the size of recorded lease liabilities — a higher rate reduces the reported obligation, so compare the chosen rate against the company's incremental borrowing rate. The operating versus finance lease mix affects both EBITDA and operating income presentation. Watch the maturity table for concentration risk: large payment cliffs in specific years may create cash flow pressure. Variable lease payments excluded from the liability measurement represent real obligations that do not appear on the balance sheet. Compare total lease costs against prior-year operating lease expense to assess the true economic burden.