11. Commitments and Contingencies

Contract Obligations

As of December 31, 2025, the Company had outstanding total non-cancelable purchase obligations of $3.3 million for general purchases and other programs and $2.3 million for manufacture and supply of roxadustat, expected to pay within the next twelve months. The Company expects to fulfill its commitments under these agreements in the normal course of business, and as such, no liability has been recorded.

See Note 9, Liability Related to Sale of Future Revenues and Note 10, Product Development Obligations for details of the respective obligations.

Legal Proceedings and Other Matters

From time to time, the Company is a party to various legal actions, both inside and outside the U.S., arising in the ordinary course of its business or otherwise. The Company accrues amounts, to the extent they can be reasonably estimated, that the Company believes will result in a probable loss (including, among other things, probable settlement value) to adequately address any liabilities related to legal proceedings and other loss contingencies. A loss or a range of loss is disclosed when it is reasonably possible that a material loss will incur and can be estimated, or when it is reasonably possible that the amount of a loss, when material, will exceed the recorded provision. The Company did not have any material accruals for any active legal action, in its consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2025.

Between April 2021 and May 2021, five putative securities class action complaints were filed against the Company and certain of its former executive officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. On October 17, 2023, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the class action at $28.5 million. The Court approved the settlement Plan of Allocation on May 28, 2024 and Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees on August 1, 2024. The court entered a class distribution order on January 1, 2025 and the amount was fully distributed during the first quarter of 2025. The settlement was fully covered by insurance.

In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company received a subpoena from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) requesting documents related to roxadustat’s pooled cardiovascular safety data. The SEC followed up with a subpoena for additional documents in the second quarter of 2024. In May 2025, the Company entered into a settlement with the SEC. As part of the settlement, and without admitting or denying the findings in the settlement offer or administrative order to be issued by the SEC, the Company agreed to pay a $1.25 million civil penalty. In September 2025, the agreement was approved by the Commission and the Company has been making payments to the agreed upon payment schedule.

Between 2022 and 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors received seven litigation demands from purported shareholders of the Company, asking the Board of Directors to investigate and take action against certain current and former officers and directors of the Company for alleged wrongdoing based on the same allegations in the derivative and securities class action lawsuits. The litigation demands have been withdrawn.

Indemnification Agreements

The Company enters into standard indemnification arrangements in the ordinary course of business, including for example, service, manufacturing and collaboration agreements. Pursuant to these arrangements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified parties for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, including in connection with intellectual property infringement claims by any third party with respect to its technology. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual after the execution of the agreement. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers that may require the Company to indemnify its directors and officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers to the extent permissible under applicable law.

There is currently one SEC complaint against the Company's former Chief Medical Officer in U.S. District Court. While the Company is not a party to this proceeding, pursuant to its indemnification agreement with the former officer, the Company is obligated to advance certain legal expenses and may be required to indemnify certain costs and judgments; however, certain judgments, settlements, or fines sought by the SEC would not be covered by the Company under the indemnification agreement.

As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s accrued liabilities related to these obligations were not material. The Company is unable to reasonably estimate the total amount of future indemnification costs beyond amounts currently accrued due to the early stage of the litigation and significant uncertainties regarding the duration, scope, and outcome of the proceedings.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 16, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 17, 2025
2023Feb 26, 2024
2022Feb 27, 2023
2021Feb 28, 2022
2020Mar 1, 2021
2019Mar 2, 2020
2018Feb 27, 2019
2017Feb 27, 2018
2016Mar 1, 2017
2015Feb 29, 2016

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.