ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATES ADOPTED
ASU 2023-09 Income Taxes
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2023-09, to enhance the transparency and usefulness of income tax disclosures. The update requires enhancements to the annual rate reconciliation, including disclosure of specific categories and additional information for reconciling items meeting a quantitative threshold. The update also requires disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes, and individual jurisdictions meeting a quantitative threshold.
The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, and may be adopted on a prospective or retrospective basis. Effective fiscal 2025, we adopted the requirements of ASU 2023-09, using the prospective method (See "Note 18—Income Taxes"). The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATES ISSUED BUT NOT YET ADOPTED
ASU 2024-03 Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, to enhance the transparency of certain expense disclosures. The update requires disclosure of specific expense categories in the notes to the financial statements at interim and annual reporting periods. The update requires disaggregated information about certain prescribed expense categories underlying any relevant income statement expense caption.
The amendments in this update are effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The amendments may be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impacts of this update and plan to adopt these amendments for annual disclosures in fiscal 2027 and interim disclosures in fiscal 2028.
ASU 2025-06 Intangibles - Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, which amends certain aspects of the accounting and disclosure of Internal use software costs. Current guidance requires capitalization of internal-use software development costs depending on the nature of the costs and the project stage during which they occur. The amendments in this update remove references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages and require entities to start capitalizing software development costs when a) management authorizes and commits to funding the software project, and b) it is probable that the project will be completed, and the software will be used to perform the intended function.
The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, and may be adopted on a prospective, modified or retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impacts of this update and plan to adopt these amendments using the prospective approach in fiscal 2026. We do not expect them to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026Feb 17, 2026Showing above
2025Feb 11, 2025
2023Feb 13, 2024
2022Feb 14, 2023
2021Feb 23, 2021
2020Feb 18, 2020
2018Feb 19, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Feb 24, 2017

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.