Accounting Pronouncements
ASUs Issued But Not Yet Adopted:
ASU 2024-03 (issued November 2024), "Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses." The ASU requires the disaggregation of certain expenses presented on the face of the income statement in a tabular footnote disclosure. The expense categories include purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation and amortization. It also requires the definition and disclosure of selling expense, a qualitative description of expense amounts not disaggregated and inclusion of existing expense disclosures within the same tabular footnote disclosure. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The update is to be adopted prospectively; however, retrospective application is permitted. The ASU will modify the Company's financial statement disclosures but is not expected to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-06 (issued September 2025), "Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software." The ASU removes all references to project development stages and provides new guidance on evaluating whether the recognition threshold to capitalize software costs has been met. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The update may be adopted prospectively, retrospectively or using a modified transition approach. The ASU will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-09 (issued November 2025), "Hedge Accounting Improvements." The ASU makes five targeted changes to the hedge accounting model including providing detailed guidance on how the analysis to demonstrate that individual transactions have a similar risk exposure is to be performed. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted, and is to be adopted prospectively. The ASU will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-10 (issued December 2025), "Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities." The ASU leverages guidance in International Accounting Standard ("IAS") 20, "Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance," which is largely followed in the absence of current GAAP guidance. The update provides recognition, measurement and presentation guidance related to government grants depending on whether the grant is related to an asset or to income. The update also explicitly excludes certain items from government grant accounting not addressed by IAS 20. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028, with early adoption permitted. The update may be adopted using a modified prospective, modified retrospective or full retrospective approach. The ASU will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Other recently issued accounting pronouncements are not expected to have a material impact or are not relevant to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.