LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS INCLGND
LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC Commitments Disclosure
Commitment and Contingencies: Legal Proceedings
We record an estimate of a loss when the loss is considered probable and estimable. Where a liability is probable and there is a range of estimated loss and no amount in the range is more likely than any other number in the range, we record the minimum estimated liability related to the claim in accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies. As additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability related to our pending litigation and revise our estimates. Revisions in our estimates of potential liability could materially impact our results of operations.
On October 31, 2019, we received three civil complaints filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio on behalf of several Indian tribes. The Northern District of Ohio is the Court that the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation (“JPML”) has assigned more than one thousand civil cases which have been designated as a Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) and captioned In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation. The allegations in these complaints focus on the activities of defendants other than the Company and no individualized factual allegations have been advanced against us in any of the three complaints. We reject all claims raised in the complaints and intend to vigorously defend these matters.
On August 22, 2024, CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed a Verified Complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery against Bexson Biomedical, Inc. (“Bexson”), asserting claims for declaratory relief and breach of contract arising out of a Captisol In Vivo Agreement (the “In Vivo Agreement”) between the parties, pursuant to which CyDex provided Bexson with research-grade Captisol and related confidential and proprietary information for a potential new formulation of ketamine being developed by Bexson. CyDex alleges that Bexson breached its obligations under the In Vivo Agreement, including by misusing confidential information and materials provided by CyDex and by using CyDex’s confidential information and materials to file patent applications that purport to cover formulations that are “not ketamine”. CyDex also asserts that Bexson failed to return and destroy CyDex’s confidential information and materials as required by the In Vivo Agreement. CyDex seeks relief including specific performance of certain co-ownership provisions of the In Vivo Agreement and disgorgement from Bexson for any benefits obtained in violation of the In Vivo Agreement. On September 27, 2024, Bexson filed a Motion to Dismiss the Verified Complaint. A Verified Amended Complaint was filed by CyDex on November 6, 2024, and a Motion to Dismiss the Verified Amended Complaint was filed by Bexson on January 17, 2025. On May 23, 2025, Bexson withdrew its pending Motion to Dismiss and filed a Verified Counterclaim, Answer, and Affirmative Defenses. On July 17, 2025, CyDex and Bexson agreed to a joint stipulation for a schedule on judgment on the pleadings, providing for briefing to be complete by November 17, 2025. CyDex filed its reply to Bexson’s counterclaim on July 23, 2025. On August 22, 2025, Bexson filed its opening brief in support of its motion for judgment on the pleadings. On September 25, 2025, CyDex filed its partial cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings and opposition to Bexson’s motion, and on October 27, 2025 Bexson filed its combined answering brief in opposition to CyDex’s motion and reply in support of its motion. CyDex filed a reply brief on November 17, 2025. Oral argument on the pending motions for judgment on the pleadings is scheduled to occur on April 22, 2026.
On July 18, 2025, CyDex received a letter (the “Notice Letter”) from PH Health Limited (“PH Health”), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Endo, Inc., stating that PH Health had submitted to the FDA an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) referencing New Drug Application No. 022235, owned by Baxter Healthcare Corp. (“Baxter”) for Captisol®-enabled Nexterone® (amiodarone hydrochloride, 150 mg/100 mL, premixed for injection). In its Notice Letter, PH Health stated that its ANDA includes a certification under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) that, in PH Health’s opinion, CyDex’s U.S. Patent No. 7,635,773 (“the ’773 patent”) is invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by Par Heath’s ANDA product. The Notice Letter included an explanation intended to support PH Health’s position that its ANDA product would not infringe the ’773 patent but did not include detailed explanations regarding invalidity or unenforceability. On August 29, 2025, during the 45 day period for filing a lawsuit pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act, Baxter and CyDex filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Distinct of New Jersey against Par Health Ltd., Par Health USA, Endo USA, Inc., Endo Operations Limited, and Endo, Inc., asserting that the ANDA filing infringed the ’773 patent. See Case No. 3:25-cv-15120-MCA. An Answer was filed on October 27, 2025. Discovery has started but a trial date has not yet been set.
From time to time, we may also become subject to other legal proceedings or claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. We currently believe that none of the claims or actions pending against us is likely to have, individually or in aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Given the unpredictability inherent in litigation, however, we cannot predict the outcome of these matters.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 27, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 28, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 29, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 28, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 28, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Feb 24, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Feb 27, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Feb 28, 2019 | |
About Commitments Disclosures
Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.
Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.