Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (ASU 2023-07), which requires all public entities, including public entities with a single reportable segment, to provide in interim and annual periods one or more measures of segment profit or loss used by the chief operating decision

maker to allocate resources and assess performance. Additionally, the standard requires disclosures of significant segment expenses and other segment items as well as incremental qualitative disclosures. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 effective December 31, 2024, on a retrospective basis. The adoption of 2023-07 did not change the way that the Company identifies its reportable segments and, as a result, did not have a material impact on the Company's segment-related disclosures.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (ASU 2023-09), which requires enhanced income tax disclosures, including specific categories and disaggregation of information in the effective tax rate reconciliation, disaggregated information related to income taxes paid, income or loss from continuing operations before income tax expense or benefit, and income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 effective December 31, 2025, on a retrospective basis. The adoption of 2023-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's income tax-related disclosures.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (ASU 2024-03), which requires disclosure about the types of costs and expenses included in certain expense captions presented on the income statement. The new disclosure requirements are effective for the Company’s annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-04, Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments. The new guidance clarifies the assessment of whether a transaction should be accounted for as an induced conversion or extinguishment of convertible debt when changes are made to conversion features as part of an offer to settle the instrument. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted, and it can be adopted either on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Modification to Receivable and Contract Assets. The new guidance reduced the cost and complexity of applying the current expected credit loss model to current accounts receivable and current contract assets for public business entities through a practical expedient to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date will continue for the remaining life of assets. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2025, including interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted on a prospective basis. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangible-Goodwill and Other- Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. The new guidance modernizes the accounting for internal-use software to current development practice, clarifies when to begin capitalizing costs and enhances disclosure requirements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, including interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted, and it can be adopted either on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvement. The new guidance creates a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures and incorporates a disclosure principle that requires disclosures at interim periods when an event or change that has a material effect on an entity has occurred since the previous year end. The guidance is effective for interim periods within annual fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027 and it can be adopted either on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 29, 2024
2022Mar 1, 2023
2021Feb 28, 2022
2020Mar 12, 2021
2019Mar 12, 2020
2018Mar 11, 2019
2017Mar 9, 2018
2016Mar 9, 2017
2015Mar 10, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.