Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Leases. The Company has obligations under operating leases for its store and other retail locations, distribution centers, offices, and equipment. Please refer to Note 19. Leases for further details regarding lease commitments and the timing of future minimum lease payments.
License and supply arrangements. The Company has entered into license and supply arrangements with partners which grant them the right to operate lululemon branded retail locations and sell lululemon products on websites in specific countries. Under these arrangements, the Company supplies the partners with lululemon products, training, and other support. As of February 1, 2026, there were 45 licensed locations, including 13 in the United Arab Emirates, nine in Saudi Arabia, eight in Israel, four in Kuwait, four in Qatar, three in Turkey, two in Belgium, one in Bahrain, and one in Denmark. On September 10, 2024, the Company acquired the lululemon branded retail locations and operations run by a third party in Mexico. The Company had previously granted the third party the right to operate retail locations and to sell lululemon products in Mexico. Please refer to Note 7. Acquisition for further information.
Contingencies
Legal proceedings
In addition to the legal proceedings described below, the Company is, from time to time, involved in routine legal matters, and audits and inspections by governmental agencies and other third parties which are incidental to the conduct of its business. This includes legal matters such as initiation and defense of proceedings to protect intellectual property rights,
employment claims, product liability claims, personal injury claims, and similar matters. The Company believes the ultimate resolution of any such legal proceedings, audits, and inspections is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on its consolidated balance sheets, results of operations or cash flows; however, litigation and regulatory matters are inherently uncertain, and it is possible that an adverse outcome in one or more matters could have a material impact in a particular reporting period. The Company has recognized immaterial provisions related to the expected outcome of legal proceedings.
On August 8, 2024, lululemon athletica inc. and certain officers of the Company were named as defendants in a purported securities class action (Patel v. Lululemon Athletica Inc., et al., No. 1:24-cv-06033) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On March 10, 2025, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegedly false and misleading public statements and omissions by defendants during the period December 8, 2023 to July 24, 2024 relating to lululemon's business, product offerings, and inventory allocation that plaintiffs allege artificially inflated the Company’s stock price. The amended complaint currently seeks unspecified monetary damages. On May 19, 2025, defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. The Company intends to defend the action vigorously.
Since November 4, 2024, six stockholder derivative complaints have been filed in the United States Court for the Southern District of New York: Bhavsar v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08405; Muszynski v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08507; Holtz v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08572; Wong v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08752; Kanaly v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08839; and Wasserman v. McDonald et al., No. 1:25-cv-02793 (collectively, the "Derivative Actions."). The complaints in the Derivative Actions are generally based on the same allegations alleged in the securities action complaint and assert claims against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers for, among other things, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and violations of Sections 10(b), 14(a), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Certain of the Derivative Actions also assert claims based on alleged false and misleading statements during the period October 28, 2020 to April 25, 2024 relating to the Company’s "IDEA" program. The complaints seek, among other things, monetary damages and equitable relief on behalf of the Company, as well as an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. On May 15, 2025, plaintiff in Bhavsar v. McDonald et al. voluntarily dismissed the complaint and that action has been terminated. On August 1, 2025, the Derivative Actions were consolidated for all purposes under the caption In re lululemon athletica inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Master File No. 1:24-cv-08507. The Derivative Actions are stayed pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss the securities class action.
Tariffs
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Power Act (the "IEEPA"). Immediately following this IEEPA decision, the U.S. Administration initiated new tariffs at different rates under alternative legislative powers. The U.S. Administration also confirmed that the IEEPA decision does not impact the removal of the de minimis exemption. The IEEPA decision did not address the processes that will govern refund claims, and the timing of any potential refunds, and the ultimate amounts, if any, that we may recover remains uncertain.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026Mar 17, 2026Showing above
2025Mar 27, 2025
2024Mar 21, 2024
2023Mar 28, 2023
2022Mar 29, 2022
2021Mar 30, 2021
2020Mar 26, 2020
2019Mar 27, 2019
2018Mar 27, 2018
2017Mar 29, 2017
2016Mar 30, 2016

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.