MARTEN TRANSPORT LTD Income Taxes Disclosure
5. Income Taxes
We adopted FASB ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, for the year ended December 31, 2025. The standard expanded disclosures related to the effective tax rate reconciliation, cash income taxes paid by jurisdiction, and income before income taxes by jurisdiction. We adopted the standard on a prospective basis. The impact of this standard is limited to financial statement disclosures. Prior-period disclosures were not recast.
Income before income taxes by jurisdiction consisted of the following:
|
(In thousands) |
2025 |
|||
|
Domestic |
$ | 24,331 | ||
|
Foreign |
46 | |||
|
Total income before income taxes |
$ | 24,377 | ||
The components of income taxes expense consisted of the following:
|
(In thousands) |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
|||||||||
|
Current: |
||||||||||||
|
Federal |
$ | 21,003 | $ | 21,254 | $ | 33,416 | ||||||
|
State |
3,234 | 3,598 | 4,706 | |||||||||
|
Foreign |
14 | - | - | |||||||||
|
Total current |
24,251 | 24,852 | 38,122 | |||||||||
|
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
|
Federal |
(14,809 | ) | (12,748 | ) | (13,526 | ) | ||||||
|
State |
(2,509 | ) | (2,680 | ) | (1,053 | ) | ||||||
|
Foreign |
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
Total deferred |
(17,318 | ) | (15,428 | ) | (14,579 | ) | ||||||
|
Total expense |
$ | 6,933 | $ | 9,424 | $ | 23,543 | ||||||
Income taxes expense by jurisdiction consisted of the following:
|
(In thousands) |
2025 |
|||
|
Federal |
$ | 6,194 | ||
|
State |
725 | |||
|
Foreign |
14 | |||
|
Total income taxes expense |
$ | 6,933 | ||
The federal statutory income tax rate is reconciled to the effective income tax rate after the adoption of FASB ASU 2023-09 as follows:
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
2025 |
|||||||
|
U.S statutory federal tax rate |
$ | 5,119 | 21 | % | ||||
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax effects |
572 | 2 | ||||||
|
Nontaxable or non-deductible items: |
||||||||
|
Non-deductible per diem expenses |
1,289 | 5 | ||||||
|
Other |
185 | 1 | ||||||
|
Tax credits |
(272 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
|
Other adjustments |
40 | - | ||||||
|
Effective tax rate |
$ | 6,933 | 28 | % | ||||
States comprising a substantial portion of state and local income tax expense in 2025, in the aggregate representing at least 50%, included Arkansas, California, Georgia, Florida, Texas and Wisconsin.
The federal statutory income tax rate is reconciled to the effective income tax rate prior to the adoption of FASB ASU 2023-09 as follows:
|
2024 |
2023 |
|||||||
|
Federal statutory income tax rate |
21 | % | 21 |
% |
||||
|
Increase in taxes arising from state income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit |
2 | 3 | ||||||
|
Per diem and other non-deductible expenses |
4 | 2 | ||||||
|
Federal tax credits |
(1 | ) | - | |||||
|
Other, net |
- | (1 | ) | |||||
|
Effective tax rate |
26 | % | 25 |
% |
||||
As of December 31, the net deferred tax liability consisted of the following:
|
(In thousands) |
2025 |
2024 |
||||||
|
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
|
Reserves and accrued liabilities |
$ | 11,881 | $ | 12,347 | ||||
|
Other |
1,495 | 1,454 | ||||||
| 13,376 | 13,801 | |||||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
|
Depreciation |
99,956 | 117,595 | ||||||
|
Prepaid expenses |
3,136 | 3,240 | ||||||
| 103,092 | 120,835 | |||||||
|
Net deferred tax liability |
$ | 89,716 | $ | 107,034 | ||||
We have not provided a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets at December 31, 2025 or 2024. We believe the deferred tax assets will be realized principally through future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences (deferred tax liabilities) and future taxable income.
Income taxes paid, net of refunds received, by jurisdiction consisted of the following:
|
(In thousands) |
2025 |
|||
|
Federal |
$ | 22,850 | ||
|
State (aggregate) |
4,157 | |||
|
Foreign |
14 | |||
|
Total income taxes paid |
$ | 27,021 | ||
State income taxes paid are presented in the aggregate, as no individual state represented 5% or more of total income taxes paid in 2025. Foreign income taxes paid relate to our Mexican subsidiary.
Our reserves for unrecognized tax benefits were $327,000 as of December 31, 2025 and $386,000 as of December 31, 2024. The $59,000 decrease in the amount reserved relates to current period tax positions. If recognized, $259,000 of the unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2025 would favorably impact our effective tax rate. Potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits of $14,000 were recognized in our financial statements as of each of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
The federal statute of limitations remains open for and forward. We file tax returns in numerous state jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 27, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 28, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 28, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 28, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 28, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 1, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Feb 28, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 1, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 9, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 15, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 11, 2016 | |
About Income Taxes Disclosures
The income tax disclosure reveals how much a company actually pays in taxes versus what the statutory rate would predict. Analysts focus on the effective tax rate (ETR) reconciliation, which breaks down every item driving the gap between the 21% federal rate and the company's reported ETR — including R&D credits, foreign rate differentials, and state taxes. Deferred tax assets (DTAs) and their valuation allowances signal management's confidence in future profitability: a rising allowance suggests the company doubts it can use accumulated tax benefits. Uncertain tax benefit (UTB) reserves quantify exposure to IRS challenges on aggressive positions.
Key signals to watch: sudden ETR drops without clear operational reasons, large increases in valuation allowances, growing UTB balances, and significant unremitted foreign earnings. Post-TCJA, pay attention to GILTI and BEAT provisions that affect multinational tax structures. Compare the cash taxes paid (from the cash flow statement) against the income tax provision to gauge earnings quality.