Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, a final standard on improvements to income tax disclosures which applies to all entities subject to income taxes. The standard requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. The standard is intended to benefit investors by providing more detailed income tax disclosures that would be helpful to understand an entity’s exposure to potential changes in jurisdictional tax legislation and the ensuing risks and opportunities, assess income tax information that affects cash flow forecasts and capital allocation decisions, and identify potential opportunities to increase future cash flows. This standard will be effective for the Company in Fiscal Year 2026 and will be applied prospectively. The impact upon adoption will be on the Company’s income tax disclosures only, with no impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, as amended by ASU 2025-01, which was issued in January 2025, requiring disclosure, in the notes to financial statements, of specified information about certain costs and expenses at each interim and annual reporting period. This will be effective for the Company for annual periods beginning with Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2028, and interim reporting periods beginning in Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2029. Early adoption of ASU 2024-03 is permitted. This amended ASU may be applied either prospectively to financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date or retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. This ASU provides all entities with a practical expedient that allows for the assumption that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset when estimating credit losses for such assets. This standard will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2027 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of applying the allowable practical expedient on its estimates of credit losses for accounts receivable and contract assets.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, Improvement to Reportable Segment Disclosures. This ASU aims to improve segment disclosures through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The standard requires disclosure of significant expense categories and amounts for such expenses, including those segment expenses that are regularly provided to the CODM, easily computable from information that is regularly provided, or significant expenses that are expressed in a form other than actual amounts. This standard is effective for the Company as of Fiscal Year 2025 and has been applied retrospectively to all prior periods as presented in Note 17. Segment Information.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Aug 13, 2025Showing above
2023Aug 18, 2023

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.