NORDSON CORP Leases Disclosure
| October 31, 2025 | October 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finance Leases | Operating Leases | Finance Leases | Operating Leases | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of right of use assets | $ | 6,239 | $ | 5,978 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest | 541 | 505 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lease cost (1) | 6,780 | $ | 18,858 | 6,483 | $ | 20,133 | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term and variable lease cost (1) | 2,409 | 4,268 | 3,019 | 2,908 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total lease cost | $ | 9,189 | $ | 23,126 | $ | 9,502 | $ | 23,041 | |||||||||||||||
| Finance Leases | Operating Leases | ||||||||||
| Cash outflows for leases | $ | 5,868 | $ | 19,501 | |||||||
| New leases entered into during the year | 7,853 | 2,014 | |||||||||
| Weighted average remaining lease term (years) | 2.77 | 7.35 | |||||||||
| Weighted average discount rate | 3.36% | 2.28% | |||||||||
| Year: | Finance Leases | Operating Leases | ||||||||||||
| 2026 | $ | 6,260 | $ | 18,882 | ||||||||||
| 2027 | 4,775 | 15,318 | ||||||||||||
| 2028 | 2,753 | 11,922 | ||||||||||||
| 2029 | 965 | 10,234 | ||||||||||||
| 2030 | 164 | 7,685 | ||||||||||||
| Later years | — | 24,879 | ||||||||||||
| Total minimum lease payments | 14,917 | 88,920 | ||||||||||||
| Amounts representing interest | 666 | 7,067 | ||||||||||||
| Present value of minimum lease payments | $ | 14,251 | $ | 81,853 | ||||||||||
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dec 17, 2025 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Dec 18, 2024 | |
| 2023 | Dec 20, 2023 | |
| 2022 | Dec 19, 2022 | |
| 2021 | Dec 17, 2021 | |
| 2020 | Dec 18, 2020 | |
| 2019 | Dec 13, 2019 | |
| 2018 | Dec 14, 2018 | |
| 2017 | Dec 15, 2017 | |
| 2016 | Dec 15, 2016 | |
| 2015 | Dec 15, 2015 | |
About Leases Disclosures
Lease disclosures under ASC 842 provide a comprehensive view of a company's leased asset portfolio, including the split between operating and finance leases, discount rates used to present-value future payments, and the maturity schedule of lease obligations. This section reveals a significant source of off-balance-sheet commitments that were largely hidden before the current standard.
Key signals: the weighted-average discount rate affects the size of recorded lease liabilities — a higher rate reduces the reported obligation, so compare the chosen rate against the company's incremental borrowing rate. The operating versus finance lease mix affects both EBITDA and operating income presentation. Watch the maturity table for concentration risk: large payment cliffs in specific years may create cash flow pressure. Variable lease payments excluded from the liability measurement represent real obligations that do not appear on the balance sheet. Compare total lease costs against prior-year operating lease expense to assess the true economic burden.