NEPHROS INC Income Taxes Disclosure
Note 11 - Income Taxes
The components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 consisted of the following:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| (in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Current | ||||||||
| Federal | ||||||||
| State and local | $ | 12 | 15 | |||||
| Total Current | $ | 12 | 15 | |||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||
| Federal | ||||||||
| State and local | ||||||||
| Total Deferred | ||||||||
| Total provision (benefit) for income taxes | $ | 12 | 15 | |||||
A reconciliation of the income tax benefit computed at the statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024 is as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| $ in thousands | Percent | $ in thousands | Percent | |||||||||||||
| U.S. Federal Statutory Rate | $ | 253 | 21.00 | % | $ | 19 | 21.00 | % | ||||||||
| State income tax expense, net of federal income tax effect* | 187 | 15.52 | % | 49 | 55.78 | % | ||||||||||
| Tax Credits | 88 | 7.26 | % | 107 | 121.37 | % | ||||||||||
| Expired NOLs | 390 | 32.30 | % | 829 | 940.83 | % | ||||||||||
| Stock-based Compensation | 215 | 17.84 | % | 56 | 63.65 | % | ||||||||||
| Other Nontaxable or Nondeductible Items | 1 | 0.03 | % | 0.09 | % | |||||||||||
| Valuation Allowance | (1,122 | ) | -92.96 | % | (1,045 | ) | -1186.05 | % | ||||||||
| Effective Tax Rate | $ | 12.00 | 0.99 | % | $ | 15 | 16.67 | % | ||||||||
The majority of the state tax expense relates to operations in New Jersey, Arizona, and California.
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 are as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
| Net operating loss carry forwards | $ | 15,082 | $ | 15,628 | ||||
| Research and development credits | 893 | 980 | ||||||
| Nonqualified stock option compensation expense | 395 | 601 | ||||||
| Lease liabilities | 255 | 348 | ||||||
| Capital loss carryforwards | 2,035 | 2,090 | ||||||
| Fixed and intangible basis difference | ||||||||
| Other temporary book - tax differences | 652 | 857 | ||||||
| Total deferred tax assets | 19,312 | 20,504 | ||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
| Lease right-of-use assets | (245 | ) | (339 | ) | ||||
| Fixed and intangible asset basis difference | (158 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||
| Total deferred tax liabilities | (403 | ) | (473 | ) | ||||
| Deferred tax assets, net | 18,909 | 20,031 | ||||||
| Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | (18,909 | ) | (20,031 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax assets after valuation allowance | $ | $ | ||||||
A valuation allowance has been recognized to offset the Company’s net deferred tax asset as it is more likely than not that such net asset will not be realized. The Company primarily considered its historical loss and potential Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limitations to arrive at its conclusion that a valuation allowance was required. The Company’s valuation allowance decreased approximately $1.1 million from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025.
At December 31, 2025, the Company had Federal income tax net operating loss carryforwards of $70 million and State income tax net operating loss carryforwards of $5.3 million. The Company had Federal research and development tax credit carryforwards of $0.90 million at December 31, 2025. The Company’s net operating losses and research and development tax credits may ultimately be limited by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and, as a result, the Company may be unable to offset future taxable income (if any) with losses, or its tax liability with credits, before such losses and credits expire. Included in the Federal net operating loss carryforwards are $14 million of losses generated from 2018 onward that have an indefinite carryover period. The remaining Federal and State net operating loss carryforwards and Federal and State tax credit carryforwards will expire at various times between 2025 and 2044 unless utilized.
The Company has analyzed the tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax returns and concluded it has no liability related to uncertain tax positions. The Company is subject to income tax examinations by major taxing authorities for all tax years subsequent to 2021 and does not anticipate a change in its uncertain tax positions within the next twelve months. The Company’s policy is to report interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Income taxes paid, net of refunds received during the year were not material. Such payments primarily related to U.S State jurisdictions. The total tax paid, net of refunds, during the year ended on December 31, 2025, was $2,000.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 12, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 24, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 15, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 23, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 3, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 1, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Feb 27, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 12, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Feb 26, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 20, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 30, 2016 | |
About Income Taxes Disclosures
The income tax disclosure reveals how much a company actually pays in taxes versus what the statutory rate would predict. Analysts focus on the effective tax rate (ETR) reconciliation, which breaks down every item driving the gap between the 21% federal rate and the company's reported ETR — including R&D credits, foreign rate differentials, and state taxes. Deferred tax assets (DTAs) and their valuation allowances signal management's confidence in future profitability: a rising allowance suggests the company doubts it can use accumulated tax benefits. Uncertain tax benefit (UTB) reserves quantify exposure to IRS challenges on aggressive positions.
Key signals to watch: sudden ETR drops without clear operational reasons, large increases in valuation allowances, growing UTB balances, and significant unremitted foreign earnings. Post-TCJA, pay attention to GILTI and BEAT provisions that affect multinational tax structures. Compare the cash taxes paid (from the cash flow statement) against the income tax provision to gauge earnings quality.