Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company determines fair value based on quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the instrument. This alternative approach also reflects the contractual terms of the instrument, as applicable, including the period to maturity, and may use observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities, and unobservable inputs, such as expected volatility. The guidance defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.
Level 3Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.
The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Financial Instruments that are not Reported at Fair Value
The Company is required to disclose at least annually the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the value. The fair value of short-term financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable and distributions payable approximates their carrying value on the consolidated balance sheet due to their short-term nature.
The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet are reported below:
December 31,
20252024
(In thousands)LevelGross Principal BalanceFair ValueGross Principal BalanceFair Value
Mortgage note payable — 1140 Avenue of the Americas (1)
3— — 99,000 69,238 
Mortgage note payable — 123 William Street
3140,000 136,990 140,000 132,474 
Mortgage note payable — 400 E. 67th Street - Laurel Condominium / 200 Riverside Blvd. - ICON Garage (2)
350,000 30,314 50,000 31,671 
Mortgage note payable — 8713 Fifth Avenue310,000 9,763 10,000 9,181 
Mortgage note payable — 196 Orchard Street351,000 47,222 51,000 44,896 
Total $251,000 $224,289 $350,000 $287,460 
__________
(1)In September 2025, the Company and the lender agreed to pursue a cooperative consensual foreclosure on the property. On September 11, 2025 the New York County Court appointed a receiver and the Company ceased managing the property. As a result of the consensual foreclosure and appointment of the receiver, the Company removed its related assets and liabilities from the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2025.
(2)The Company recorded impairment charges of $3.1 million and $9.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2025 for its 400 E. 67th Street and 200 Riverside Blvd. properties, respectively. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $25.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2024 for its 400 E. 67th Street property. As a result, the Company adjusted the fair value of the 400 E. 67th Street allocable mortgage balance to the property's current carrying value as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. For additional information please see Note 4 — Real Estate Investments.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Apr 15, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 19, 2025
2023Apr 1, 2024
2022Mar 16, 2023
2021Mar 18, 2022
2020Mar 29, 2021
2019Mar 19, 2020
2018Mar 15, 2019
2017Mar 19, 2018
2016Mar 28, 2017
2015Mar 16, 2016

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.