Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Note 2: New Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and, to a lesser extent, other authoritative rulemaking bodies promulgate GAAP to regulate the standards of accounting in the United States. From time to time, the FASB issues new GAAP standards, known as Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) some of which, upon adoption, may have the potential to change the way in which the Company recognizes or reports within its consolidated financial statements. The following table provides a description of standards that have not yet been adopted as of December 31, 2024, but could have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Standards Adopted as of December 31, 2024 |
|||||
Standard |
|
Description |
|
Required Date |
Effect on Consolidated Financial Statements |
Reference Rate Reform (ASU 2020-04: Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting [Topic 848]: Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848) |
|
The amendments provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform. The amendments apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments (1) apply to contract modifications that replace a reference rate affected by reference rate reform, (2) provide exceptions to existing guidance related to changes to the critical terms of a hedging relationship due to reference rate reform (3) provide optional expedients for fair value hedging relationships, cash flow hedging relationships, and net investment hedging relationships, and (4) provide a onetime election to sell, transfer, or both sell and transfer debt securities classified as held-to-maturity that reference a rate affected by reference rate reform and that are classified as held-to-maturity before January 1, 2020. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope. ASU 2021-01 clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions in ASC 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. ASU 2021-01 also amends the expedients and exceptions in ASC 848 to capture the incremental consequences of the scope clarification and to tailor the existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the discounting transition. |
|
Adopted as of December 31, 2024, as amended by ASU 2022-06. |
The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Reporting ASU 2023-07 (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures |
|
ASU 2023-07 was issued to expand the disclosures for reportable segments made by public entities in response to |
|
Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. |
The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements. |
Standards Not Yet Adopted as of December 31, 2024 |
|||||
Standard |
|
Description |
|
Required Date |
Effect on Consolidated Financial Statements |
Income taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures 2023-09 |
|
Amendments to ASC740 are being made to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures. The enhancements are made to provide information to better assess how an entity's operations and related tax risks and tax planning and operational opportunities affect its tax rate and prospects for future cash flows. The objective of these disclosure requirements is for an entity, particularly an entity operating in multiple jurisdictions, to disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature and magnitude of factors contributing to the difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate. |
|
Public business entities are required to apply this guidance to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. |
The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements. |
Standard |
|
Description |
|
Required Date |
Effect on Consolidated Financial Statements |
Income Statement ASU 2024-03 (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses |
|
Amendments to ASC740 are being made to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures. The enhancements are made to provide information to better assess how an entity's operations and related tax risks and tax planning and operational opportunities affect its tax rate and prospects for future cash flows. The objective of these disclosure requirements is for an entity, particularly an entity operating in multiple jurisdictions, to disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature and magnitude of factors contributing to the difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate. |
|
Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. |
The Company is evaluating the adoption of the ASU but does not expect it will have a material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements. |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.