PureCycle Technologies, Inc. Fair Value Disclosure
NOTE 17 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company records cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature or stated rates. The Company records debt at cost less any discounts and issuance costs.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis were classified within the fair value hierarchy as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2025 |
|
|
December 31, 2024 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
140,694 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
140,694 |
|
|
$ |
10,409 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
10,409 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
16,656 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,656 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
9,356 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,356 |
|
|
|
9,172 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,172 |
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Corporate Debt |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,631 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,631 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Put Option liability |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,443 |
|
|
$ |
3,443 |
|
Warrant liability: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
RTI Warrants |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,109 |
|
|
|
10,109 |
|
Private Warrants - |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
Series A Warrants |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,673 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,673 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
61,329 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
61,329 |
|
Series B Warrants |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,749 |
|
|
|
15,749 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,468 |
|
|
|
20,468 |
|
Series C Warrants |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
29,400 |
|
|
|
29,400 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
37,850 |
|
|
|
37,850 |
|
Total warrant |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
13,673 |
|
|
$ |
45,158 |
|
|
$ |
58,831 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
61,329 |
|
|
$ |
68,870 |
|
|
$ |
130,199 |
|
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments not remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2025 |
|
|
December 31, 2024 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
Green Convertible Notes |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
244,560 |
|
|
$ |
244,560 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
233,125 |
|
|
$ |
233,125 |
|
Revenue bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Related party bonds |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
117,928 |
|
|
|
117,928 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
98,481 |
|
|
|
98,481 |
|
Third-party bonds |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
31,118 |
|
|
|
31,118 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,044 |
|
|
|
11,044 |
|
Total revenue bonds |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
149,046 |
|
|
$ |
149,046 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
109,525 |
|
|
$ |
109,525 |
|
For the instruments classified as Level 3, significant changes in any of the significant unobservable inputs in isolation would not result in a materially different fair value estimate. The fair value of the liabilities above is derived from the trading price of the Company's publicly traded bonds on the last trading day of the fiscal year. The Company's publicly traded bonds are thinly traded and, as such, the Company has deemed the input as an unobservable input. Since each of the instruments classified as Level 3 are being valued using similar inputs, a significant change that would impact expected volatility or the market price of PCT's Common Stock could result in a material change to the total combined value of these instruments. An increase in one or both of these inputs would result in a higher assessed value for each instrument.
Measurement of the Private Warrants
The private warrants are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using a Black-Scholes model. The private warrants are classified as Level 3 and were valued using the following assumptions:
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2025 |
|
|
2024 |
|
||
Expected annual dividend yield |
|
|
— |
% |
|
|
— |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
101.5 |
% |
|
|
93.1 |
% |
Risk-free rate of return |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Expected option term (years) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
The expected term of the private warrants is determined based on the duration of time the warrants are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of issuance. The expected volatility is based on the implied volatility calculated for the Company’s public warrants, which have similar characteristics to the private warrants. The dividend yield on the Company’s private warrants is assumed to be zero as the Company has not historically paid dividends on its Common Stock. The fair value of the underlying Company shares was determined using a Black-Scholes value calculation.
A summary of the private warrants activity from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 is as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2024 |
|
$ |
443 |
|
Warrants transferred from initial purchaser |
|
|
(273 |
) |
Change in fair value |
|
|
(161 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2025 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
Refer to Note 16 - Warrants for further information.
Measurement of the RTI Warrants
On January 16, 2025, RTI exercised its outstanding warrants. The Company received $5.4 million in cash and issued 1.5 million shares of the Company's Common Stock. The Company determined the RTI Warrants were to be measured using a Level 3 fair value measurement and was remeasured using a Binomial Tree option pricing model to calculate its fair value using the following assumptions:
|
|
December 31, 2024 |
|
|
Expected annual dividend yield |
|
|
— |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
77.1 |
% |
Risk-free rate of return |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Expected option term (years) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
The expected term of the RTI Warrants was determined based on the duration of time the warrants were expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility was calculated based on the specific volatility of the Company’s publicly-traded Common Stock. The dividend yield on the Company’s warrants was assumed to be zero as the Company has not historically paid dividends on its Common Stock. The fair value of the underlying Company shares was determined using a Binomial Tree pricing model.
A summary of the RTI Warrants activity from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 is as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2024 |
|
$ |
10,109 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
Exercise of warrants |
|
|
(8,818 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2025 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Measurement of the Series A Warrants
The Series A Warrants meet the definition of derivative instruments and are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the market price of the Company’s publicly traded warrants, with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. The Company has determined the publicly traded warrants to be an appropriate proxy to value the Series A Warrants, as both warrants have similar redemption features and the same exercise price. The Series A Warrants are classified as Level 2 for both initial measurement at issuance and subsequent measurement each period.
Measurement of the Series B Warrants
The Series B Warrants meet the definition of derivative instruments and are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company has determined the Series B Warrants to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and has performed initial recognition and ongoing remeasurement using a Monte Carlo simulation to calculate its fair value using the following assumptions:
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2025 |
|
|
2024 |
|
||
Expected annual dividend yield |
|
|
— |
% |
|
|
— |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
101.5 |
% |
|
|
93.1 |
% |
Risk-free rate of return |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Expected option term (years) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
The expected term of the Series B Warrants is determined based on the duration of time the warrants are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the valuation date. The expected volatility is based on the implied volatility calculated for the Company’s public warrants, which have similar characteristics to the Series B Warrants. The dividend yield on the Company’s warrants is assumed to be zero as the Company has not historically paid dividends on its Common Stock. The fair value of the underlying Company shares was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation.
A summary of the Series B Warrants activity from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 is as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2024 |
|
$ |
20,468 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
(4,719 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2025 |
|
$ |
15,749 |
|
Measurement of the Series C Warrants
The Series C Warrants meet the definition of derivative instruments and are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company has determined the Series C Warrants to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and has performed initial recognition and ongoing remeasurement using a Monte Carlo simulation to calculate its fair value using the following assumptions:
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2025 |
|
|
2024 |
|
||
Expected annual dividend yield |
|
|
— |
% |
|
|
— |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
101.5 |
% |
|
|
93.1 |
% |
Risk-free rate of return |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Expected option term (years) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
The expected term of the Series C Warrants granted is determined based on the duration of time the warrants are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the valuation date. The expected volatility is based on the implied volatility calculated for the Company’s public warrants, which have similar characteristics to the Series B Warrants. The dividend yield on the Company’s warrants is assumed to be zero as the Company has not historically paid dividends on its Common Stock. The fair value of the underlying Company shares was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation.
A summary of the Series C Warrants activity from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 is as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2024 |
|
$ |
37,850 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
(8,450 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2025 |
|
$ |
29,400 |
|
Measurement of the Put Option Liability
The Put Option liability meets the definition of a derivative instrument and is measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company has determined the Put Option liability to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and has performed initial recognition and ongoing remeasurement using a Monte Carlo simulation to calculate its fair value using the following assumptions:
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2025 (1) |
|
|
2024 |
|
||
Risk-free rate of return |
|
|
— |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Credit spread |
|
|
— |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
__________
(1) During June 2025, the Company announced its plans to construct the Thailand Facility, which has adjusted the timeline on construction of the Augusta Facility. Because the Put Option is contingent upon the Company incurring any indebtedness that is senior to the Series A Preferred Stock and/or secured by the assets of PureCycle Augusta, LLC, this adjusted timeline has resulted in the likelihood of the Put Option being exercised as remote. Accordingly, there has been no value ascribed to the Put Option as of December 31, 2025.
A summary of the Put Option activity from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 is as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2024 |
|
$ |
3,443 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
(3,443 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2025 |
|
$ |
— |
|
In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities that are subject to fair value measurements.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 26, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 27, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 6, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 16, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 29, 2022 | |
About Fair Value Disclosures
Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.
Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.