New Accounting Standards Adopted in 2025
In the fourth quarter of 2025, we adopted a new accounting standard which requires enhanced disclosures primarily related to existing rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. The standard was applied prospectively. As this accounting standard only impacts disclosures, the adoption did not impact our consolidated financial statements. See Note 5.
In the third quarter of 2025, we early adopted a new accounting standard, which adds a scope exception to exclude from derivative accounting non-exchange-traded contracts with variables (referred to as “underlyings”) that are based on operations or activities specific to one of the parties to the contract. This new scope exception may apply to certain R&D funding arrangements. When adopted early in an interim reporting period, application of the standard is required as of the beginning of the current annual reporting period. We had no contracts or embedded features that were accounted for as derivatives but are no longer accounted for as derivatives as a result of applying the new standard. The adoption of this new accounting standard had no impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 27, 2025
2023Feb 22, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 24, 2022
2020Feb 25, 2021
2019Feb 27, 2020
2018Feb 28, 2019
2017Feb 22, 2018
2016Feb 23, 2017
2015Feb 29, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.