In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2024-03 (“ASU 2024-03”), Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), which adds guidance on providing qualitative and quantitative disclosures about certain costs and expenses. Although early adoption is permitted, we expect to adopt ASU-2024 03 on a prospective basis when the requirements become effective for the year ended December 31, 2027. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2024-03 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09 (“ASU 2023-09”), Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which enhances income tax disclosures, including disclosures about the existing rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. We adopted this ASU on a prospective basis for the year-ended December 31, 2025 and incorporated any such material disclosures in Note 10: “Income Taxes” for additional information.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 20, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 20, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2021Feb 18, 2022
2020Feb 26, 2021
2019Feb 27, 2020
2018Feb 28, 2019
2017Mar 1, 2018

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.