25. Commitments and Contingencies

Restricted Cash

In connection with certain of the noted sale/leaseback agreements, cash of $352.3 million and $476.2 million, respectively, was required to be restricted as security as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, which will be released over the lease term. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company also had certain letters of credit and bank guarantees backed by security deposits totaling $193.1 million and $285.1 million, respectively, of which $159.6 million and $242.7 million are security for the above noted sale/leaseback agreements, respectively, and $33.5 million and $42.4 million are customs related letters of credit and bank guarantees, respectively.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had $80.0 million and $73.7 million, respectively, held in escrow related to the construction of certain hydrogen production plants.

Litigation

Legal matters are handled in the ordinary course of business. The outcome of any such matters, regardless of the merits, is inherently uncertain; therefore, assessing the likelihood of loss and any estimated damages is difficult and subject to considerable judgment. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably

estimated. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred. While we are not in a position to accurately predict the outcome of any legal or other proceedings, where there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss may be incurred, GAAP requires us to disclose an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of loss, if material, or make a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. Except for below, a reasonably possible loss or range of loss associated with any individual legal proceeding cannot be currently estimated.

Securities Litigation and Related Stockholder Derivative Litigation

2023 Securities Action and Related Derivative Litigation

A consolidated action is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware asserting claims under the federal securities laws against the Company and certain of its senior officers on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of the Company’s securities, styled In re Plug Power, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 1:23-cv-00576-MN (the “2023 Securities Action”). The plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on September 28, 2023, in which they assert claims under the federal securities laws against the Company and four of its senior officers, Mr. Marsh, Mr. Middleton, Sanjay Shrestha, and former officer David Mindnich, on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between January 19, 2022 and March 1, 2023. The complaint alleges that the defendants made “materially false and/or misleading statements” about the Company’s business and operations, including the Company’s revenue goals for 2022, its ability to effectively manage its supply chain and product manufacturing, and its progress in construction of new hydrogen production capacity. On February 4, 2025, the Court issued an opinion and order dismissing the consolidated complaint, with leave to replead. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on February 25, 2025, in which they no longer name Mr. Mindnich. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on April 30, 2025, and briefing was completed on July 23, 2025.

Beginning on September 13, 2023, three separate actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware and in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims derivatively, on behalf of the Company, against certain former and current Company officers and directors based on the allegations and claims in the 2023 Securities Action. Those cases have been consolidated in the District of Delaware under the caption In re Plug Power, Inc. Stockholder Deriv. Litig., No. 1:23-cv-01007-MN (D. Del.). The defendants named in the constituent complaint were Mr. Marsh, Mr. Middleton, Mr. Mindnich, Martin Hull, Ms. Helmer, Mr. Kenausis, Mr. McNamee, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Silver, Mr. Willis, and current or former directors Jean Bua, Kavita Mahtani, and Kyungyeol Song. In an order entered on April 26, 2024, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation to stay all proceedings until motions to dismiss have been resolved in the 2023 Securities Action.

2024 Securities Litigation

On March 22, 2024, Ete Adote filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York asserting claims under the federal securities laws against the Company, Mr. Marsh, and Mr. Middleton, on behalf of an alleged class of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between May 9, 2023 and January 16, 2024, styled Adote v. Plug Power, Inc. et al., No. 1:24-cv-00406-MAD-DJS (N.D.N.Y.). The complaint alleges that the defendants made misstatements concerning the Company’s progress in construction of new hydrogen production capacity and its ability to effectively manage its supply chain. On April 30, 2024, a second complaint asserting substantially similar claims against the same defendants, but on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between March 1, 2023 and January 16, 2024, was filed in the Northern District of New York, styled Lee v. Plug Power, et al., No. 1:24;cv-0598-MAD-DJS (N.D.N.Y.). On November 25, 2024, the magistrate judge issued an order consolidating the two cases and appointing lead plaintiffs. Lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint on August 25, 2025. All defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint, and briefing was completed on December 23, 2025.

Other Litigation

On October 23, 2024, a case entitled First Solar, Inc. v. Plug Power Inc., Index No. 655610/2024 was filed in the New York State Supreme Court, New York County, asserting a claim for breach of contract associated with a purchase order for solar panels manufactured by First Solar to be purchased by the Company. The complaint seeks monetary relief along with pre-judgment interest. On December 22, 2025, First Solar moved for summary judgment, which has been fully

briefed and is pending oral argument. As of December 31, 2025, the Company recorded an accrual related to ongoing litigation costs.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and marketable securities. Cash and restricted cash are maintained in accounts with financial institutions which, at times, may exceed the Federal depository insurance coverage of $250 thousand. The Company has not experienced losses on these accounts and management believes, based upon the quality of the financial institutions, that the credit risk with regard to these deposits is not significant.

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables exist due to the limited number of select customers with whom the Company has initial commercial sales arrangements. To mitigate credit risk, the Company performs appropriate evaluation of a prospective customer’s financial condition.

As of December 31, 2025, one customer individually exceeded 10% of total consolidated accounts receivable with a balance of $48.9 million, or 36.3%, of the Company’s consolidated accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2024, one customer individually exceeded 10% of total consolidated accounts receivable with a balance of $38.5 million, or 24.5%, of the Company’s consolidated accounts receivable.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, two customers individually exceeded 10% of total consolidated revenues. One customer accounted for $171.8 million, or 24.2%, and one customer accounted for $101.7 million, or 14.3%, of total consolidated revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2024, two customers individually exceeded 10% of total consolidated revenues. One customer accounted for $104.6 million, or 16.6%, and one customer accounted for $90.9 million, or 14.4%, of total consolidated revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2023, two customers individually exceeded 10% of total consolidated revenues. One customer accounted for $209.0 million, or 23.4%, and one customer accounted for $97.0 million, or 10.9%, of total consolidated revenues.

Unconditional Purchase Obligations

The Company has entered into certain off–balance sheet commitments that require the future purchase of goods or services (“unconditional purchase obligations”). The Company’s unconditional purchase obligations primarily consist of supplier arrangements, take or pay contracts and service agreements. For certain vendors, the Company’s unconditional obligation to purchase a minimum quantity of raw materials at an agreed upon price is fixed and determinable; while certain other raw material costs will vary due to product forecasting and future economic conditions.

Future payments under non-cancelable unconditional purchase obligations with a remaining term in excess of one year as of December 31, 2025, were as follows (in thousands):

2026

31,451

2027

36,577

2028

39,555

2029

2030

2031 and thereafter

Total

107,583

During 2025, the Company finalized the renegotiation of a supplier arrangement that previously contained minimum purchase requirements which resulted in the Company recording a charge of $40.3 million in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2025, the Company made payments of $13.1 million and had a remaining liability of $27.2 million which was recorded in contingent consideration, loss accrual for service contracts, and other current liabilities.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 2, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 3, 2025
2023Feb 29, 2024
2022Mar 1, 2023
2021Mar 1, 2022
2020May 14, 2021
2019Mar 10, 2020
2018Mar 13, 2019
2017Mar 12, 2018
2016Mar 10, 2017
2015Mar 15, 2016

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.