Recently Adopted Accounting Standards — In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-07 to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements and enhance disclosures about significant segment expenses. We adopted this new accounting pronouncement effective January 1, 2024 and expanded our consolidated financial statement disclosures in order to comply with the update. See Note 17 for details.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09 to improve income tax disclosure. We adopted this accounting pronouncement effective January 1, 2025, on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, but resulted in expanded disclosures within the Income Taxes footnote. See Note 14 for details.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards — In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03 to expand disclosure requirements related to certain income statement expenses, which requires public entities to disclose additional information about specific expense
categories in the notes to the financial statements on an interim and annual basis. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05 to provide entities the option to use a practical expedient to assume balance sheet conditions remain unchanged when developing forecasts for estimating expected credit losses. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06 to improve the accounting for internal-use software cost by increasing the operability of the recognition guidance by removing all references to software development project stages so that the guidance is neutral to different software development methods. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11 to clarify the applicability of the interim reporting guidance, the types of interim reporting, and the form and content of interim financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Per the FASB, the amendment does not intend to change the fundamental nature of interim reporting or expand or reduce current interim disclosure requirements but rather provide clarity and improve navigability of the existing interim reporting requirements. The update will be effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. We are currently evaluating the impact this pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 10, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 11, 2025
2023Feb 27, 2024
2022Feb 13, 2023
2021Feb 16, 2022
2020Feb 9, 2021
2019Feb 13, 2020
2018Feb 13, 2019
2017Feb 20, 2018
2016Feb 13, 2017
2015Feb 10, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.