Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Standard/Description
Effective Date
Impact of Adoption on the Company's Financial Statements
ASU 2023-09: In December 2023, the FASB issued amended guidance related to improvements to income tax disclosures. The amendments require annually (i) enhanced disclosures in connection with an entity's effective tax rate reconciliation and (ii) income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction.
January 1, 2025
Adopted prospectively; see Note 15
ASU 2024-03: In November 2024, the FASB issued new guidance which requires disclosure of disaggregated income statement expense information about specific categories (including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization) in the notes to financial statements.
January 1, 2027 for annual reporting periods and January 1, 2028 for interim reporting periods
Currently evaluating impact
ASU 2025-06: In September 2025, the FASB issued new guidance to modernize the accounting for software costs by updating the criteria as to when entities are required to start capitalizing internal-use software (by removing all references to software development "projects stages").
January 1, 2028
Early adopted January 1, 2026; no significant impact expected

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 4, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 5, 2025
2023Feb 5, 2024
2021Feb 7, 2022
2020Feb 8, 2021
2019Feb 7, 2020
2018Feb 7, 2019
2017Feb 8, 2018
2016Feb 9, 2017
2015Feb 11, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.