Relay Therapeutics, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
As noted above, the Company adopted (a) ASU 2016-13, as well as the related amendments thereto, on January 1, 2022 and (b) ASU 2023-07 upon filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. The adoption of the standards noted did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements or footnotes, except as otherwise noted.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which is intended to provide enhancements to annual income tax disclosures. In particular, the standard requires more detailed information in the income tax rate reconciliation, as well as other enhancements. The standard is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2024 and early adoption was permitted. The Company adopted the standard upon filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and such standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements or footnotes.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 26, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 26, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 22, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 23, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 24, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 25, 2021 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.