Stablecoin Development Corp Fair Value Disclosure
NOTE 3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following tables present the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted |
||||||||||||||||
|
Prices in |
||||||||||||||||
|
Active |
||||||||||||||||
|
Markets |
Significant |
|||||||||||||||
|
for |
Other |
Significant |
||||||||||||||
|
As of |
Identical |
Observable |
Unobservable |
|||||||||||||
|
December |
Items |
Inputs |
Inputs |
|||||||||||||
|
31, 2025 |
(Level 1) |
(Level 2) |
(Level 3) |
|||||||||||||
|
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted cash held as a certificate of deposit |
$ | 267 | $ | 267 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
|
Warrant liability |
$ | 30,432 | $ | — | $ | 30,432 | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted |
||||||||||||||||
|
Prices in |
||||||||||||||||
|
Active |
||||||||||||||||
|
Markets |
Significant |
|||||||||||||||
|
for |
Other |
Significant |
||||||||||||||
|
As of |
Identical |
Observable |
Unobservable |
|||||||||||||
|
December |
Items |
Inputs |
Inputs |
|||||||||||||
|
31, 2024 |
(Level 1) |
(Level 2) |
(Level 3) |
|||||||||||||
|
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted cash held as a certificate of deposit |
$ | 477 | $ | 477 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
The Company’s restricted cash held as a deposit is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because it is valued using quoted market prices in active markets, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.
The warrant liability is measured at fair value based on the intrinsic value of the warrants, which is determined using the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock at the measurement date. Because the warrants themselves are not actively traded and the valuation relies on observable market inputs other than quoted prices for identical instruments, the liability is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Black Scholes Valuation Models and Assumptions
The Company utilizes a Black Scholes model for various valuations as outlined throughout this report. The following tables summarize the assumptions utilized for valuations impacting results for the periods reported.
Warrant Liabilities
Certain of the Company’s warrants were subject to stockholder approval upon issuance or amendment and prior to exercise. Warrants requiring stockholder approval are recorded as a liability at fair value upon issuance or amendment and continue to be recorded as a liability at fair value at each reporting date until stockholder approval occurs at which time they are transferred to stockholders’ equity at their fair value on the date of approval.
For warrants with substantive exercise prices, fair value is determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model as outlined below. Pre-funded warrants with a nominal exercise price are considered to be substantially intrinsic value instruments, as the exercise price is de minimis relative to the fair value of the underlying common stock. Accordingly, the fair value of such pre-funded warrants is based on the market price of the Company’s common stock less the nominal exercise price. See Note 9, “Common Stock Warrants” for additional information and the definitions of the Company’s warrants.
|
December 2023 Warrants |
||||
|
Measurement event |
Stockholder Approval |
|||
|
Date |
May 28, 2024 |
|||
|
Total Value (in millions) |
$ | 0.2 | ||
|
Gain (Loss) (in thousands) |
$ | (51 | ) | |
|
Assumptions: |
||||
|
Exercise price |
$ | 43.75 | ||
|
Market price |
$ | 24.70 | ||
|
Volatility |
83.9 | % | ||
|
Risk-free rate |
4.56 | % | ||
|
Dividend yield |
0.0 | % | ||
|
Term (years) |
5.1 | |||
|
March |
March |
|||||||
|
2024 |
2024 |
|||||||
|
Warrant |
Warrant |
|||||||
|
Measurement event |
Reporting Date |
Stockholder Approval |
||||||
|
Date |
March 31, 2024 |
May 28, 2024 |
||||||
|
Total Value (in millions) |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | ||||
|
Gain (Loss) (in thousands) |
$ | 21 | $ | 28 | ||||
|
Assumptions: |
||||||||
|
Exercise price |
$ | 24.50 | $ | 24.50 | ||||
|
Market price |
$ | 18.30 | $ | 24.70 | ||||
|
Volatility |
86.9 | % | 83.9 | % | ||||
|
Risk-free rate |
4.21 | % | 4.56 | % | ||||
|
Dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
|
Term (years) |
5.5 | 5.3 | ||||||
Warrant Modifications
Amendments to warrant terms are recorded as a non-cash gain (or loss) on modification of common stock warrants. The gain or loss represents the decrease or increase in the fair value of the amended warrants when comparing the value immediately before and after amendment using the Black Scholes option pricing model. Fair value was determined using a Black Scholes model as outlined below.
|
September 2022, November 2022, and May 2023 Warrants |
||||||||||||
|
Measurement event |
Prior to amendment |
After amendment |
||||||||||
|
Date |
June 14, 2024 |
June 14, 2024 |
||||||||||
|
Total Value (in thousands) |
$66 |
$100 |
||||||||||
|
Loss (in thousands) |
not applicable |
$70 |
||||||||||
|
Assumptions: |
||||||||||||
|
Exercise price |
$ |
43.75 |
- | 262.50 |
$ |
12.50 |
||||||
|
Market price |
$ |
12.55 |
$ |
12.55 |
||||||||
|
Volatility |
89.3 |
% |
89.3 |
% |
||||||||
|
Risk-free rate |
4.27 |
- |
5.08 |
% |
4.27 |
- |
5.08 |
% |
||||
|
Dividend yield |
0.0 |
% |
0.0 |
% |
||||||||
|
Term (years) |
1.0 |
- |
4.4 |
1.0 |
- |
4.4 |
% |
|||||
Warrant Down Round Feature Adjustment
Terms of the Company’s outstanding 2024 July Warrants included a down round feature adjustment whereby the applicable exercise price was automatically adjusted (see Note 7, “Financing Activities”). When the exercise price was adjusted, the Company recorded a deemed dividend as a reduction to income available to common stockholders. In accordance with ASC 820, the deemed dividend is measured as the difference between (1) the fair value of the 2024 July Warrants immediately prior to the conversion price adjustment and (2) the fair value of the 2024 July Warrants immediately after the conversion price adjustment. Fair value was determined using a Black Scholes model, as outlined below.
|
Series F-1 |
||||||||
|
Measurement event |
Prior to adjustment |
After adjustment |
||||||
|
Date |
September 27, 2024 |
September 27, 2024 |
||||||
|
Total value (in millions) |
$ | 1.7 | $ | 1.9 | ||||
|
Deemed dividend (in millions) |
not applicable |
$ | 0.2 | |||||
|
Assumptions: |
||||||||
|
Exercise price |
$ | 5.50 | $ | 3.30 | ||||
|
Market price |
$ | 3.55 | $ | 3.55 | ||||
|
Volatility |
97.1 | % | 97.1 | % | ||||
|
Risk-free rate |
3.55 | % | 3.55 | % | ||||
|
Dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
|
Term (in years) |
4.84 | 4.84 | ||||||
|
Series F-2 |
||||||||
|
Measurement event |
Prior to adjustment |
After adjustment |
||||||
|
Date |
September 27, 2024 |
September 27, 2024 |
||||||
|
Total value (in millions) |
$ | 0.2 | $ | 0.6 | ||||
|
Deemed dividend (in millions) |
not applicable |
$ | 0.4 | |||||
|
Assumptions: |
||||||||
|
Exercise price |
$ | 5.50 | $ | 3.30 | ||||
|
Market price |
$ | 3.55 | $ | 3.55 | ||||
|
Volatility |
97.1 | % | 97.1 | % | ||||
|
Risk-free rate |
4.64 | % | 4.64 | % | ||||
|
Dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
|
Term (in years) |
0.34 | 0.34 | ||||||
|
Series F-3 |
||||||||
|
Measurement event |
Prior to adjustment |
After adjustment |
||||||
|
Date |
September 27, 2024 |
September 27, 2024 |
||||||
|
Total value (in millions) |
$ | 0.6 | $ | 1.0 | ||||
|
Deemed dividend (in millions) |
not applicable |
0.4 | ||||||
|
Assumptions: |
||||||||
|
Exercise price |
$ | 5.50 | $ | 3.30 | ||||
|
Market price |
$ | 3.55 | $ | 3.55 | ||||
|
Volatility |
97.1 | % | 97.1 | % | ||||
|
Risk-free rate |
4.10 | % | 4.10 | % | ||||
|
Dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
|
Term (in years) |
0.84 | 0.84 | ||||||
Preferred Stock Conversion Price Adjustments
Terms of the Company’s outstanding Series C Preferred Stock historically included a ratchet whereby the applicable conversion price could be adjusted (see Note 10, “Stockholders’ Deficit”). The applicable ratchet provisions of the Company’s outstanding Preferred Stock terminated during the year ended December 31, 2024. Prior to its termination, when a conversion price for outstanding Preferred Stock was adjusted under the ratchet, the Company recorded a deemed dividend as a reduction to income available to common stockholders. In accordance with ASC 820, the deemed dividend is measured as the difference between (1) the fair value of the Preferred Stock immediately prior to the conversion price adjustment (but without the ratchet anti-dilution protection feature) and (2) the fair value of the Preferred Stock immediately after the conversion price adjustment (but without the ratchet anti-dilution protection feature). Fair value was determined using a Black Scholes model as outlined below.
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
||||||||
|
Measurement event |
Prior to ratchet |
After ratchet |
||||||
|
Date |
March 24, 2024 |
March 24, 2024 |
||||||
|
Total value (a) (in millions) |
$ | 0.5 | $ | 0.9 | ||||
|
Deemed dividend (in millions) |
not applicable |
$ | 0.4 | |||||
|
Assumptions: |
||||||||
|
Exercise price |
$ | 43.75 | $ | 24.50 | ||||
|
Market price |
$ | 23.85 | $ | 23.85 | ||||
|
Volatility |
79.9 | % | 79.9 | % | ||||
|
Risk-free rate |
5.51 | % | 5.51 | % | ||||
|
Dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
|
Term (in years) |
0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||
|
(a) |
Includes value of incremental shares underlying preferred stock and adjusted for probability of occurrence. |
Derivative liability Issued in Conjunction with Unsecured Convertible Notes
Upon issuance in March 2024, the Unsecured Convertible Notes contained a lender’s conversion option which represented an embedded call option requiring bifurcation as an embedded derivative liability at fair value (see Note 8, “Convertible Notes” for additional discussion). Fair value was determined using a Black Scholes model as outlined below.
|
Unsecured Convertible Notes derivative |
Unsecured Convertible Notes derivative |
|||||||
|
Measurement event |
Issuance |
Shareholder Approval |
||||||
|
Date |
March 25, 2024 |
May 28, 2024 |
||||||
|
Total value (in millions) |
$ | 0.2 | $ | 0.2 | ||||
|
Gain (Loss) (in thousands) |
not applicable |
$ | (82 | ) | ||||
|
Assumptions: |
||||||||
|
Exercise price |
$ | 24.50 | $ | 24.50 | ||||
|
Market price |
$ | 22.55 | $ | 24.70 | ||||
|
Volatility |
86.9 | % | 83.9 | % | ||||
|
Risk-free rate |
4.54 | % | 4.94 | % | ||||
|
Dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
|
Term (years) |
2.0 | 1.8 | ||||||
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 19, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Apr 2, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 26, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 31, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 29, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 25, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 26, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 29, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 21, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 23, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 4, 2016 | |
About Fair Value Disclosures
Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.
Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.