13.   Fair Value Measurements

As defined in ASC Topic 820, fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measures, the following hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation methodologies used to measure fair value:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data available, which requires management to develop its own assumptions in pricing the asset or liability.

Our assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value are summarized below ($000’s omitted):

  ​ ​ ​

  ​ ​ ​

Fair Value

Fair Value

December 31, 

December 31, 

Financial Instrument

  ​ ​ ​

Hierarchy

  ​ ​ ​

2025

  ​ ​ ​

2024

Cash and cash equivalents

 

Level 1

$

22,506

$

18,860

Short-term investments

Level 1

9,300

8,927

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

Level 1

14,031

15,941

Revolving Credit Facility

 

Level 2

 

5,000

 

5,000

Our financial instruments are comprised of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term debt. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments derived from quoted market prices and are considered a level 1. Interest on the Credit Facility is at a variable rate, and as such the debt obligation outstanding approximates fair value and is considered a level 2.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

We have certain assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis under the circumstances and events described in Note 3 — Broadcast Licenses, Goodwill and Other Intangibles, and are adjusted to fair value only when the carrying values are more than the fair values.

During the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company wrote down the Ithaca, New York broadcast license with a carrying value of $4,181,000 to its fair value of $3,013,000, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $1,168,000. During the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company wrote down our entire goodwill balance of $19,229,000, resulting in a non-cash

impairment charge of $19,229,000. Both of these non-cash impairment charges are included in the net loss at December 31, 2025.

During the fourth quarter of 2024, we reviewed the fair value of the assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and concluded that these assets were not impaired as the fair value of these assets equaled or exceeded their carrying values.

During the fourth quarter of 2025, we measured our prepaid rent at fair value on a non-recurring basis under the Sale-Leaseback Transaction described in Note 16 – Sale Leaseback Transaction for the tower sale and subsequent lease of tower space.

Additionally, we measured Property, Plant and Equipment and Broadcast License at fair value on a non-recurring basis under the circumstances and events described in Note 9 – Acquisitions and Dispositions for our Lafayette, Indiana market purchase during 2024.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Apr 14, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 31, 2025
2023Mar 15, 2024
2022Mar 16, 2023
2021Mar 16, 2022
2020Mar 16, 2021
2019Mar 13, 2020
2018Mar 15, 2019
2017Mar 13, 2018
2016Mar 10, 2017
2015Mar 14, 2016

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.