SMARTFINANCIAL INC. New Standards Disclosure
Recently Issued Not Yet Effective Accounting Pronouncements:
The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements not yet in effect that could impact the accounting, reporting, and/or disclosure of financial information by the Company.
In November 2024, FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses.” ASU 2024-03 requires disaggregated disclosure of income statement expenses for public business entities. ASU 2024-03 requires new financial statement disclosures in tabular format, disaggregating information about prescribed categories underlying any relevant income statement expense caption. The prescribed categories include, among other things, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization. Additionally, entities must disclose the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses. ASU 2024-03 is effective for us fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, though early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing ASU 2024-03, and its adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2025, FASB issued ASU No. 2025-08, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326). The amendments in this update expand the use of the gross-up approach to certain acquired loans beyond purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update must be adopted prospectively to loans that are acquired on or after the initial application date. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In November 2025, FASB issued ASU No. 2025-09, “Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815)” The amendments in this update are intended to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of an entity’s risk management activities. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years, though early adoption is permitted. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In December 2025, FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11 “Interim Reporting (Topic 270)” The amendments in this update clarify current interim disclosure requirements and provide a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures. The update also incorporates a disclosure principle that requires entities to disclose events that occur after the end of the last annual reporting period. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, including interim periods within those fiscal years, though early adoption is permitted. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In December 2025, FASB issued ASU No. 2025-12 “Codification Improvements” ASU 2025-12 address suggestions received from stakeholders on the Accounting Standards Codification and to make other incremental improvements to U.S. GAAP. The update represents changes to the Codification that (1) clarify, (2) correct errors, or (3) make minor improvements. The amendments make the Codification easier to understand and apply. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2023, FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures.” ASU 2023-09 requires public business entities to disclose in their rate reconciliation table additional categories of information about federal, state and foreign income taxes and to provide more details about the reconciling items in certain categories if items meet a quantitative threshold. ASU 2023-09 also requires all entities to disclose income taxes paid, net of refunds, disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign taxes for annual periods and to disaggregate the information by jurisdiction based on a quantitative threshold, among other things. The guidance became effective for us on January 1, 2025, and has been applied prospectively. ASU 2023-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 16, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 17, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 15, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 16, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 14, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 16, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 12, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 18, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 16, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 31, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 30, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.