Tecnoglass Inc. Income Taxes Disclosure
Note 15. Income Taxes
The components of income before taxes are as follows:
| Twelve months ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| United States | 109,898 | 48,399 | 47,623 | |||||||||
| Foreign | 125,394 | 176,759 | 213,792 | |||||||||
| Income before taxes | 235,292 | 225,158 | 261,414 | |||||||||
The components of income tax expense are as follows:
| Twelve months ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Current income tax | ||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | (22,817 | ) | $ | (9,535 | ) | $ | (9,895 | ) | |||
| State and local | (7,186 | ) | (2,594 | ) | (2,667 | ) | ||||||
| Foreign | (38,100 | ) | (53,590 | ) | (56,996 | ) | ||||||
| Total current income tax | (68,103 | ) | (65,719 | ) | (69,558 | ) | ||||||
| Deferred income tax | ||||||||||||
| Federal | 1,911 | 124 | 260 | |||||||||
| State and local | 235 | 88 | 72 | |||||||||
| Foreign | 5,477 | 1,658 | (8,679 | ) | ||||||||
| Total deferred income tax | 7,623 | 1,870 | (8,346 | ) | ||||||||
| Total income tax provision | $ | (75,726 | ) | $ | (63,849 | ) | $ | (77,904 | ) | |||
The Company has the following deferred tax assets and liabilities:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment adjustments | 207 | 52 | ||||||
| Tax benefit on installation of renewable energy project | 83 | |||||||
| Depreciation | 821 | 635 | ||||||
| Accounts payable and debt | 647 | 223 | ||||||
| Foreign currency transactions | 1,919 | 2,440 | ||||||
| Other | 1,015 | 58 | ||||||
| Total deferred tax assets | $ | 4,609 | $ | 3,491 | ||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and Amortization | (6,396 | ) | (7,902 | ) | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment adjustments | (4,753 | ) | ||||||
| Other | (2,403 | ) | (1,966 | ) | ||||
| Foreign currency transactions | (12,204 | ) | (4,757 | ) | ||||
| Total deferred tax liabilities | $ | (25,756 | ) | $ | (14,625 | ) | ||
| Net deferred tax | $ | (21,147 | ) | $ | (11,134 | ) | ||
A reconciliation of the statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:
| Year ended December 31, 2025 | ||||||||
| $ Amount | % | |||||||
| Tax provision at the U.S. federal statutory rate | 49,411 | 21.0 | % | |||||
| State and local income tax, net of federal income tax effect (1) | 6,023 | 2.6 | % | |||||
| Foreign tax effects: | ||||||||
| Statutory tax rate difference between Colombia and United States | 17,180 | 7.3 | % | |||||
| Other | 1,795 | 0.8 | % | |||||
| Other | 1,317 | 0.5 | % | |||||
| Income tax expense and effective income tax rate | 75,726 | 32.2 | % | |||||
| (1) | The state that contributed the majority of the effect in this category was Florida. |
The Company is incorporated in the Cayman Islands, which does not impose corporate income taxes. For purposes of the rate reconciliation, the Company uses the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21%, as the majority of its operating revenue is generated in the United States.
As previously disclosed for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, prior to the adoption of ASU 2023-09, the following is a reconciliation of the difference between the effective income tax rate and the statutory tax rate:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Income tax expense at statutory rates | 31.2 | % | 33.0 | % | ||||
| Non-deductible expenses | 1.5 | % | 0.9 | % | ||||
| Non-taxable income | -4.3 | % | -1.2 | % | ||||
| Effective tax rate | 28.4 | % | 29.8 | % | ||||
No single individual item contributed significantly to the reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate to the statutory rate during the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Income taxes paid, net of refunds, during the periods presented were as follows:
| 2025 | ||||
| Income taxes paid: | ||||
| Domestic: | ||||
| Federal | 19,911 | |||
| State | 3,246 | |||
| Foreign: | ||||
| Colombia | 52,901 | |||
| Other | 52 | |||
| Total cash taxes paid | $ | 76,110 | ||
We are subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Primarily the state of Florida, the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Panama. As of December 31, 2025, our tax years 2020 to 2024 remain subject to examination by tax authorities.
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was enacted, reinstating 100% bonus depreciation, increasing Section 179 expensing limits, modifying the Section 163(j) interest limitation, full expensing of domestic R&D and deductibility of qualified production structures. As these provisions are temporary in nature, their current and deferred tax effects offset, resulting in no material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 2, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 28, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 29, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 7, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 16, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 8, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 6, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 8, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 14, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 10, 2017 | |
| 2015 | May 31, 2016 | |
About Income Taxes Disclosures
The income tax disclosure reveals how much a company actually pays in taxes versus what the statutory rate would predict. Analysts focus on the effective tax rate (ETR) reconciliation, which breaks down every item driving the gap between the 21% federal rate and the company's reported ETR — including R&D credits, foreign rate differentials, and state taxes. Deferred tax assets (DTAs) and their valuation allowances signal management's confidence in future profitability: a rising allowance suggests the company doubts it can use accumulated tax benefits. Uncertain tax benefit (UTB) reserves quantify exposure to IRS challenges on aggressive positions.
Key signals to watch: sudden ETR drops without clear operational reasons, large increases in valuation allowances, growing UTB balances, and significant unremitted foreign earnings. Post-TCJA, pay attention to GILTI and BEAT provisions that affect multinational tax structures. Compare the cash taxes paid (from the cash flow statement) against the income tax provision to gauge earnings quality.